Abstract
Abstract. Crop models routinely use meteorological variations to estimate crop yield. Soil moisture, however, is the primary source of water for plant growth. The aim of this study is to investigate the intraseasonal predictability of soil moisture to estimate silage maize yield in Germany. We also evaluate how approaches considering soil moisture perform compare to those using only meteorological variables. Silage maize is one of the most widely cultivated crops in Germany because it is used as a main biomass supplier for energy production in the course of the German Energiewende (energy transition). Reduced form fixed effect panel models are employed to investigate the relationships in this study. These models are estimated for each month of the growing season to gain insights into the time-varying effects of soil moisture and meteorological variables. Temperature, precipitation, and potential evapotranspiration are used as meteorological variables. Soil moisture is transformed into anomalies which provide a measure for the interannual variation within each month. The main result of this study is that soil moisture anomalies have predictive skills which vary in magnitude and direction depending on the month. For instance, dry soil moisture anomalies in August and September reduce silage maize yield more than 10 %, other factors being equal. In contrast, dry anomalies in May increase crop yield up to 7 % because absolute soil water content is higher in May compared to August due to its seasonality. With respect to the meteorological terms, models using both temperature and precipitation have higher predictability than models using only one meteorological variable. Also, models employing only temperature exhibit elevated effects.
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Reference100 articles.
1. Agriculture Risk Management Team: Weather Index Insurance for Agriculture: Guidance for Development Practitioners, Tech. Rep. November, The World Bank, Washington, 2011.
2. Akaike, H.: Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle, in: International Symposium on Information Theory, 267–281, Springer New York, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2011.12.027, 1973.
3. Andresen, J. A., Alagarswamy, G., Rotz, C. A., Ritchie, J. T., and LeBaron, A. W.: Weather impacts on maize, soybean, and alfalfa production in the Great Lakes region, 1895–1996, Agron. J., 93, 1059–1070, https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2001.9351059x, 2001.
4. Angrist, J. D. and Pischke, J.-S.: Mostly harmless econometrics: an empiricist's companion, March, Princeton Univers. Press, https://doi.org/10.1057/be.2009.37, 2008.
5. Annan, F. and Schlenker, W.: Federal Crop Insurance and the Disincentive to Adapt to Extreme Heat, Am. Econ. Rev., 105, 262–266, https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.p20151031, 2015.
Cited by
36 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献