Technical Note: Formal blind intercomparison of OH measurements: results from the international campaign HOxComp

Author:

Schlosser E.,Brauers T.,Dorn H.-P.,Fuchs H.,Häseler R.,Hofzumahaus A.,Holland F.,Wahner A.,Kanaya Y.,Kajii Y.,Miyamoto K.,Nishida S.,Watanabe K.,Yoshino A.,Kubistin D.,Martinez M.,Rudolf M.,Harder H.,Berresheim H.,Elste T.,Plass-Dülmer C.,Stange G.,Schurath U.

Abstract

Abstract. Hydroxyl radicals (OH) are the major oxidizing species in the troposphere. Because of their central importance, absolute measurements of their concentrations are needed to validate chemical mechanisms of atmospheric models. The extremely low and highly variable concentrations in the troposphere, however, make measurements of OH difficult. Three techniques are currently used worldwide for tropospheric observations of OH after about 30~years of technical developments: Differential Optical Laser Absorption Spectroscopy (DOAS), Laser-Induced Fluorescence Spectroscopy (LIF), and Chemical Ionisation Mass Spectrometry (CIMS). Even though many measurement campaigns with OH data were published, the question of accuracy and precision is still under discussion. Here, we report results of the first formal, blind intercomparison of these techniques. Six OH instruments (4~LIF, 1~CIMS, 1~DOAS) participated successfully in the ground-based, international HOxComp campaign carried out in Jülich, Germany, in summer 2005. Comparisons were performed for three days in ambient air (3~LIF, 1 CIMS) and for six days in the atmosphere simulation chamber SAPHIR (3~LIF, 1~DOAS). All instruments were found to measure tropospheric OH concentrations with high sensitivity and good time resolution. The pairwise correlations between different data sets were linear and yielded high correlation coefficients (r2=0.75−0.96). Excellent absolute agreement was observed for the instruments at the SAPHIR chamber, yielding slopes between 1.01 and 1.13 in the linear regressions. In ambient air, the slopes deviated from unity by factors of 1.06 to 1.69, which can partly be explained by the stated instrumental accuracies. In addition, sampling inhomogeneities and calibration problems have apparently contributed to the discrepancies. The absolute intercepts of the linear regressions did not exceed 0.6×106 cm−3, mostly being insignificant and of minor importance for daytime observations of OH. No relevant interferences with respect to ozone, water vapour, NOx and peroxy radicals could be detected. The HOxComp campaign has demonstrated that OH can be measured reasonably well by current instruments, but also that there is still room for improvement of calibrations.

Publisher

Copernicus GmbH

Subject

Atmospheric Science

Reference67 articles.

1. Apel, E. C., Brauers, T. Koppman, R., Bandowe, B., Bossmeyer, J., Holzke, C., Tillmann, R., Wahner, A., Wegener, R., Brunner, A., Jocher, M., Ruuskanen, T., Spirig, C., Steigner, D., Steinbrecher, R., Gomez Alvarez, E., Müller, K., Burrows, J. P., Schade, G., Solomon, S. J., Ladstätter-Weissenmayer, A., Simmonds, P., Young, D., Hopkins, J. R., Lewis, A. C., Legreid, G., Reimann, S., Hansel, A., Wisthaler, A., Blake, R. S., Ellis, A. M., Monks, P. S., and Wyche, K. P.: Intercomparison of oxygenated volatile organic compound measurements at the SAPHIR atmosphere simulation chamber, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D20307, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009865, 2008.

2. Armerding, W., Spiekermann, M., and Comes, F. J.: OH multipass absorption: Absolute and in situ method for local monitoring of tropospheric hydroxyl radicals, J. Geophys. Res., 99(D1), 1225–1239, https://doi.org/10.1029/93JD02859, 1994.

3. Aschmutat, U., Hessling, M., Holland, F., and Hofzumahaus, A.: A tunable source of hydroxyl (OH) and hydroperoxy (HO2) radicals: in the range between 10$^6$ and 10$^9$ cm−3, in: Proc. of the 6th European Symposium: Physico-Chemical Behaviour of Atmospheric Pollutants 2, edited by: Angeletti, G. and Restelli, G., Varese, Report EUR 15609/2 EN, 811–816, 1994.

4. Beck, S. M., Bendura, R. J., Dougal, D. S., Hoell, J. M., Gregory, G. L., Curfman, H. J., Davis, D. D., Bradshaw, J., Rodgers, M. O., Wang, C. C., Davis, L. I., Campbell, M. J., Torres, A. T., Carroll, M. A., Ridley, B. A., Sachse, G. W., Hill, G. F., Condon, E. P., and Rasmussen, R. A.: Operational overview of NASA GTE/CITE 1 airborne instrument intercomparisons: carbon monoxide, nitric oxide, and hydroxyl instrumentation, J. Geophys. Res., 92, 1977–1985, 1987.

5. Berresheim, H., Elste, T., Plass-Dülmer, C., Eisele, F. L., Tanner, D. J.: Chemical ionization mass spectrometer for long-term measurements of atmospheric OH and H2SO4, Int. J. Mass Spectrom., 202(1–3), 91–109, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1387-3806(00)00233-5, 2000.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3