Fractional snow-covered area: scale-independent peak of winter parameterization
-
Published:2021-02-09
Issue:2
Volume:15
Page:615-632
-
ISSN:1994-0424
-
Container-title:The Cryosphere
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:The Cryosphere
Author:
Helbig NoraORCID, Bühler YvesORCID, Eberhard Lucie, Deschamps-Berger CésarORCID, Gascoin SimonORCID, Dumont MarieORCID, Revuelto JesusORCID, Deems Jeff S.ORCID, Jonas Tobias
Abstract
Abstract. The spatial distribution of snow in the mountains is significantly influenced through interactions of topography with wind, precipitation, shortwave and longwave radiation, and avalanches that may relocate the accumulated snow. One of the most crucial model parameters for various applications such as weather forecasts, climate predictions and hydrological modeling is the fraction of the ground surface that is covered by snow, also called fractional snow-covered area (fSCA). While previous subgrid parameterizations for the spatial snow depth distribution and fSCA work well, performances were scale-dependent. Here, we were able to confirm a previously established empirical relationship of peak of winter parameterization for the standard deviation of snow depth σHS by evaluating it with 11 spatial snow depth data sets from 7 different geographic regions and snow climates with resolutions ranging from 0.1 to 3 m. An enhanced performance (mean percentage errors, MPE, decreased by 25 %) across all spatial scales ≥ 200 m was achieved by recalibrating and introducing a scale-dependency in the dominant scaling variables. Scale-dependent MPEs vary between −7 % and 3 % for σHS and between 0 % and 1 % for fSCA. We performed a scale- and region-dependent evaluation of the parameterizations to assess the potential performances with independent data sets. This evaluation revealed that for the majority of the regions, the MPEs mostly lie between ±10 % for σHS and between −1 % and 1.5 % for fSCA. This suggests that the new parameterizations perform similarly well in most geographical regions.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Earth-Surface Processes,Water Science and Technology
Reference79 articles.
1. Andreadis, K. M. and Lettenmaier, D. P.: Assimilating remotely sensed snow
observations into a macroscale hydrology model, Adv. Water Resour., 29,
872–886, 2006. a 2. Baba, M. W., Gascoin, S., Kinnard, C., Marchane, A., and Hanich, L.: Effect of
Digital Elevation Model Resolution on the Simulation of the Snow Cover
Evolution in the High Atlas, Water Resour. Res., 55, 5360–5378,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR023789, 2019. a 3. Bellaire, S. and Jamieson, B.: Forecasting the formation of critical snow
layers using a coupled snow cover and weather model, Cold. Reg. Sci.
Technol., 94, 37–44, 2013. a 4. Bühler, Y., Marty, M., Egli, L., Veitinger, J., Jonas, T., Thee, P., and Ginzler, C.: Snow depth mapping in high-alpine catchments using digital photogrammetry, The Cryosphere, 9, 229–243, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-229-2015, 2015. a, b, c 5. Bühler, Y., Adams, M. S., Bösch, R., and Stoffel, A.: Mapping snow depth in alpine terrain with unmanned aerial systems (UASs): potential and limitations, The Cryosphere, 10, 1075–1088, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-1075-2016, 2016. a, b
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|