Abstract
Abstract. Geological uncertainty quantification is critical to subsurface modeling and
prediction, such as groundwater, oil or gas, and geothermal resources, and needs to be
continuously updated with new data. We provide an automated method for
uncertainty quantification and the updating of geological models using borehole
data for subsurface developments within a Bayesian framework. Our
methodologies are developed with the Bayesian evidential learning protocol
for uncertainty quantification. Under such a framework, newly acquired
borehole data directly and jointly update geological models (structure,
lithology, petrophysics, and fluids), globally and spatially, without
time-consuming model rebuilding. To address the above matters, an ensemble of
prior geological models is first constructed by Monte Carlo simulation from
prior distribution. Once the prior model is tested by means of a falsification
process, a sequential direct forecasting is designed to perform the joint
uncertainty quantification. The direct forecasting is a statistical learning
method that learns from a series of bijective operations to establish
“Bayes–linear-Gauss” statistical relationships between model and data
variables. Such statistical relationships, once conditioned to actual
borehole measurements, allow for fast-computation posterior geological
models. The proposed framework is completely automated in an open-source
project. We demonstrate its application by applying it to a generic gas
reservoir dataset. The posterior results show significant uncertainty
reduction in both spatial geological model and gas volume prediction and
cannot be falsified by new borehole observations. Furthermore, our automated
framework completes the entire uncertainty quantification process
efficiently for such large models.
Reference64 articles.
1. Abbott, J.: Technical Report Mineral Resource Estimation for the Wonarah Phosphate Project Northern Territory, Australia, available at: https://avenira.com/other-projects/wonarah/technical-report-wonarah (last access: 13 January 2020), 2013.
2. Abdi, H., Williams, L. J., and Valentin, D.: Multiple factor analysis:
principal component analysis for multitable and multiblock data sets, WIREs Comp. Stat., 5, 149–179, https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.1246,
2013.
3. Athens, N. D. and Caers, J. K.: A Monte Carlo-based framework for assessing
the value of information and development risk in geothermal exploration,
Appl. Energ., 256, 113932, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APENERGY.2019.113932, 2019a.
4. Aydin, O. and Caers, J. K.: Quantifying structural uncertainty on fault networks using a marked point process within a Bayesian framework, Tectonophysics, 712, 101–124, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2017.04.027, 2017.
5. Barfod, A. A. S., Møller, I., Christiansen, A. V., Høyer, A.-S., Hoffimann, J., Straubhaar, J., and Caers, J.: Hydrostratigraphic modeling using multiple-point statistics and airborne transient electromagnetic methods, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 3351–3373, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-3351-2018, 2018.
Cited by
45 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献