Role-play simulations as an aid to achieve complex learning outcomes in hydrological science
-
Published:2019-05-16
Issue:5
Volume:23
Page:2369-2378
-
ISSN:1607-7938
-
Container-title:Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.
Author:
Bring ArvidORCID, Lyon Steve W.
Abstract
Abstract. Students in hydrology are expected to become proficient in a set of
quantitative skills while also acquiring the ability to apply their
problem-solving abilities in real-life situations. To achieve both these
types of learning outcomes, there is broad evidence that activity-based
learning is beneficial. In this paper, we argue that role-play simulations in
particular are useful for achieving complex learning outcomes, i.e., making
students able to coordinate and integrate various analytical skills in
complicated settings. We evaluated the effects of an integrated water
resources management (IWRM) negotiation simulation next to more traditional
teaching methods intended to foster quantitative understanding. Results
showed that despite similar student-reported achievement of both complex and
quantitative intended learning outcomes, the students favored the negotiation
simulation over the traditional method. This implies that role-play
simulations can motivate and actively engage a classroom, thereby creating a
space for potential deeper learning and longer retention of knowledge. While
our findings support the utility of simulations to teach complex learning
outcomes and indicate no shortcoming in achieving such outcomes next to
traditional methods aimed at quantitative learning outcomes, simulations are
still not widely used to foster activity-based learning in the classroom. We
thus conclude by presenting three particularly challenging areas of role-play
simulations as learning tools that serve as potential barriers to their
implementation and suggest ways to overcome such roadblocks.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Engineering,General Environmental Science
Reference30 articles.
1. Basco-Carrera, L., Warren, A., van Beek, E., Jonoski, A. and Giardino, A.:
Collaborative modelling or participatory modelling? A framework for water
resources management, Environ. Model. Softw., 91, 95–110,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.01.014, 2017. 2. Bazan, E. J.: Environmental Simulation Games, J. Environ. Educ., 8,
41–51, https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1976.9941564, 1976. 3. Biggs, J.: Aligning teaching for constructing learning, Higher Education,
available at: https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/aligning-teaching-constructing-learning
(last access: 23 April 2019), 1–4, 2003. 4. Bring, A., Shiklomanov, A., and Lammers, R. B.: Pan-Arctic river discharge:
prioritizing monitoring of future climate change hot spots, Earth's Future,
5, 72–92, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016EF000434, 2017. 5. D'Angelo, C., Rutstein, D., Harris, C., Bernard, R., Borokhovski, E., and
Haertel, G.: Simulations for STEM learning: Systematic review and
meta-analysis, SRI International, Menlo Park, 5 pp., 2014.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|