Virtual field trips utilizing virtual outcrop: construction, delivery and implications for the future
-
Published:2022-07-20
Issue:3
Volume:5
Page:227-249
-
ISSN:2569-7110
-
Container-title:Geoscience Communication
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Geosci. Commun.
Author:
Pugsley Jessica H.ORCID, Howell John A., Hartley Adrian, Buckley Simon J.ORCID, Brackenridge Rachel, Schofield Nicholas, Maxwell Gail, Chmielewska Magda, Ringdal Kari, Naumann Nicole, Vanbiervliet Joris
Abstract
Abstract. The advent of photorealistic, 3D computer models of cliff sections (virtual
outcrops) has improved the immersive nature of virtual geological
field trips. As the COVID-19 pandemic led to widespread national and
international travel restrictions, virtual field trips (VFTs) became
practical and essential substitutes for traditional field trips and
accelerated the development of VFTs based on virtual outcrop data. This
contribution explores two such VFTs delivered to a masters level Integrated Petroleum
Geoscience course at the University of Aberdeen. These VFTs are based on
traditional field trips that are normally run to the Spanish Pyrenees and
Utah (USA). The paper summarizes the delivery mechanism for VFTs based on
virtual outcrops and examines student perception, gauged primarily through
questionnaires and learning outcomes. The VFTs were run in LIME, a software
specifically designed for the interpretation of 3D models and the delivery
of VFTs. Overall, the student perception was very positive and comparable to
satisfaction with the conventional trips. Staff feedback and student
assessments suggest that the learning outcomes were satisfied and highlight
the value of this method of teaching for students who are unable to attend
the field trip and as an addition for those who can.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous),Communication
Reference86 articles.
1. Argles, T., Minocha, S., and Burden, D.: Virtual field teaching has evolved:
Benefits of a 3D gaming environment, Geology Today, 31, 222–226, https://doi.org/10.1111/gto.12116, 2015. 2. Atchison, C. L. and Feig, A. D.: Theoretical perspectives on constructing
experience through alternative field-based learning environments for
students with mobility impairments, Qualitative Inquiry in Geoscience Education Research, 44, 11–21, https://doi.org/10.1130/SPE474, 2011. 3. Bailey, J., Whitmeyer, S., and De Paor, D. (Eds.): Introduction: The application of google geo tools to geoscience education and research, in: Google Earth and Virtual Visualizations in Geoscience Education and Research, Geological Society of America, 492, 7–19, https://doi.org/10.1130/2012.2492(00), 2012. 4. Bakke, K., Gjelberg, J., and Petersen, S. A.: Compound seismic modelling of the Ainsa II turbidite system, Spain: Application to deep-water channel systems offshore Angola, Mar. Petrol. Geol., 25, 1058–1073, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2007.10.009, 2008. 5. Barth, N. C., Stock, G. M., and Atit, K.: From a virtual field trip to geologically reasoned decisions in Yosemite Valley, Geosci. Commun., 5, 17–28, https://doi.org/5194/gc-5-17-2022, 2022.
Cited by
17 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|