Abstract
Abstract. Wildfires in the United Kingdom (UK) can pose a threat to people, infrastructure and the natural environment (e.g. to the carbon in peat soils), and their simultaneous occurrence within and across UK regions can periodically place considerable stress upon the resources of Fire and Rescue Services. "Fire danger" rating systems (FDRS) attempt to anticipate periods of heightened fire risk, primarily for early-warning purposes. The UK FDRS, termed the Met Office Fire Severity Index (MOFSI) is based on the Fire Weather Index (FWI) component of the Canadian Forest FWI System. MOFSI currently provides operational mapping of landscape fire danger across England and Wales using a simple thresholding of the final FWI component of the Canadian System. Here we explore a climatology of the full set of FWI System components across the entire UK (i.e. extending to Scotland and Northern Ireland), calculated from daily 2 km gridded numerical weather prediction data, supplemented by meteorological station observations. We used this to develop a percentile-based calibration of the FWI System optimised for UK conditions. We find the calibration to be well justified, since for example the values of the "raw" uncalibrated FWI components corresponding to a very "extreme" (99th percentile) fire danger situation can vary by up to an order of magnitude across UK regions. Therefore, simple thresholding of the uncalibrated component values (as is currently applied) may be prone to large errors of omission and commission with respect to identifying periods of significantly elevated fire danger compared to "routine" variability. We evaluate our calibrated approach to UK fire danger rating against records of wildfire occurrence, and find that the Fine Fuel Moisture Code (FFMC), Initial Spread Index (ISI) and final FWI component of the FWI system generally have the greatest predictive skill for landscape fires in Great Britain, with performance varying seasonally and by land cover type. At the height of the most recent severe wildfire period in the UK (2 May 2011), 50 % of all wildfires occurred in areas where the FWI component exceeded the 99th percentile, and for each of the ten most serious wildfire events that occurred in the 2010–2012 period, at least one FWI component per event was found to surpass the 95th percentile. Overall, we demonstrate the significant advantages of using a calibrated, percentile-based approach for classifying UK fire danger, and believe our findings provide useful insights for any future redevelopment of the current operational UK FDRS.
Funder
Natural Environment Research Council
Reference61 articles.
1. Albertson, K., Aylen, J. Cavan, G., and McMorrow, J.: Forecasting the outbreak of moorland wild fires in the English Peak District, J. Environ. Manage., 90, 2642–2651, 2009.
2. Alexander, M. E. and Cruz, M. G.: Assessing the effect of foliar moisture on the spread rate of crown fires, Int. J. Wildland Fire, 22, 415–427, 2012.
3. Alexander, M. E. and de Groot, W. J.: Fire behaviour in Jack pine stands as related to the Canadian Forest Fire Weather Index (FWI) System, Canadian Forestry Service, Northern Forestry Centre, Edmonton, Alberta, 1988.
4. Anderson, S. A. J. and Anderson, W. R.: Predicting the elevated dead fine fuel moisture content in gorse (Ulex europaeus L.) shrub fuels, Can. J. Forest Res., 39, 2355–2368, 2009.
5. Andrews, P. L., Loftsgaarden, D. O., and Bradshaw, L. S.: Evaluation of fire danger rating indexes using logistic regression and percentile analysis, Int. J. Wildland Fire, 12, 213–226, 2003.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献