Improving Madden–Julian oscillation simulation in atmospheric general circulation models by coupling with a one-dimensional snow–ice–thermocline ocean model
-
Published:2022-07-20
Issue:14
Volume:15
Page:5529-5546
-
ISSN:1991-9603
-
Container-title:Geoscientific Model Development
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Geosci. Model Dev.
Author:
Tseng Wan-LingORCID, Hsu Huang-Hsiung, Lan Yung-Yao, Lee Wei-LiangORCID, Tu Chia-YingORCID, Kuo Pei-Hsuan, Tsuang Ben-Jei, Liang Hsin-Chien
Abstract
Abstract. A one-column, turbulent, and kinetic-energy-type ocean mixed-layer model
(snow–ice–thermocline, SIT), when coupled with three atmospheric general
circulation models (AGCMs), yields superior Madden–Julian oscillation (MJO)
simulations. SIT is designed to have fine layers similar to those observed
near the ocean surface; therefore, it can realistically simulate the diurnal
warm layer and cool skin. This refined discretization of the near-surface ocean
in SIT provides accurate sea surface temperature (SST) simulation, and
thus facilitates realistic air–sea interaction. Coupling SIT with
the European Centre/Hamburg Model version 5, the Community Atmosphere Model
version 5, and the High-Resolution Atmospheric Model significantly improved MJO
simulation in three coupled AGCMs compared to the AGCM driven by a
prescribed SST. This study suggests two major improvements to the coupling
process. First, during the preconditioning phase of MJO over the Maritime
Continent (MC), the often underestimated surface latent heat bias in AGCMs
can be corrected. Second, during the phase of strongest convection over the MC,
the change in intraseasonal circulation in the meridional circulation
enhancing near-surface moisture convergence is the dominant factor in the
coupled simulations relative to the uncoupled experiments. The study results
show that a fine vertical resolution near the surface, which better captures
temperature variations in the upper few meters of the ocean, considerably
improves different models with different configurations and physical
parameterization schemes; this could be an essential factor for accurate MJO
simulation.
Funder
Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference72 articles.
1. Adler, R. F., Huffman, G. J., Chang, A., Ferraro, R., Xie, P.-P., Janowiak,
J., Rudolf, B., Schneider, U., Curtis, S., and Bolvin, D.: The version-2
global precipitation climatology project (GPCP) monthly precipitation
analysis (1979–present), J. Hydrometeorol., 4, 1147–1167, 2003. 2. Ahn, M. S., Kim, D., Kang, D., Lee, J., Sperber, K. R., Gleckler, P. J.,
Jiang, X., Ham, Y. G., and Kim, H.: MJO propagation across the Maritime
Continent: Are CMIP6 models better than CMIP5 models?, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 47, e2020GL087250, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL087250, 2020. 3. Banzon, V. F., Reynolds, R. W., Stokes, D., and Xue, Y.: A
1/4-spatial-resolution daily sea surface temperature climatology based on a
blended satellite and in situ analysis, J. Climate, 27, 8221–8228,
2014. 4. Behringer, D. and Xue, Y.: Evaluation of the global ocean data assimilation
system at NCEP: The Pacific Ocean, Proc. Eighth Symp. on Integrated
Observing and Assimilation Systems for Atmosphere, Oceans, and Land Surface, http://origin.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/people/yxue/pub/13.pdf (last access: 11 August 2020), 2004. 5. Benedict, J. J. and Randall, D. A.: Impacts of Idealized Air–Sea Coupling
on Madden–Julian Oscillation Structure in the Superparameterized CAM,
J. Atmos. Sci., 68, 1990–2008, https://doi.org/10.1175/jas-d-11-04.1,
2011.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|