Impact of planetary boundary layer turbulence on model climate and tracer transport
Author:
McGrath-Spangler E. L., Molod A.ORCID, Ott L. E., Pawson S.
Abstract
Abstract. Planetary boundary layer (PBL) processes are important for weather, climate, and tracer transport and concentration. One measure of the strength of these processes is the PBL depth. However, no single PBL depth definition exists and several studies have found that the estimated depth can vary substantially based on the definition used. In the Goddard Earth Observing System (GEOS-5) atmospheric general circulation model, the PBL depth is particularly important because it is used to calculate the turbulent length scale that is used in the estimation of turbulent mixing. This study analyzes the impact of using three different PBL depth definitions in this calculation. Two definitions are based on the scalar eddy diffusion coefficient and the third is based on the bulk Richardson number. Over land, the bulk Richardson number definition estimates shallower nocturnal PBLs than the other estimates while over water this definition generally produces deeper PBLs. The near surface wind velocity, temperature, and specific humidity responses to the change in turbulence are spatially and temporally heterogeneous, resulting in changes to tracer transport and concentrations. Near surface wind speed increases in the bulk Richardson number experiment cause Saharan dust increases on the order of 1 × 10−4 kg m−2 downwind over the Atlantic Ocean. Carbon monoxide (CO) surface concentrations are modified over Africa during boreal summer, producing differences on the order of 20 ppb, due to the model's treatment of emissions from biomass burning. While differences in carbon dioxide (CO2) are small in the time mean, instantaneous differences are on the order of 10 ppm and these are especially prevalent at high latitude during boreal winter. Understanding the sensitivity of trace gas and aerosol concentration estimates to PBL depth is important for studies seeking to calculate surface fluxes based on near-surface concentrations and to studies projecting future concentrations.
Funder
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference74 articles.
1. Bacmeister, J. T., Suarez, M. J., and Robertson, F. R.: Rain reevaporation, boundary layer-convection interactions, and Pacific rainfall patterns in an AGCM, J. Atmos. Sci., 63, 3383–3403, https://doi.org/10.1175/jas3791.1, 2006. 2. Baker, D. F., Law, R. M., Gurney, K. R., Rayner, P., Peylin, P., Denning, A. S., Bousquet, P., Bruhwiler, L., Chen, Y.-H., Ciais, P., Fung, I. Y., Heimann, M., John, J., Maki, T., Maksyutov, S., Masaarie, K., Prather, M., Pak, B., Taguchi, S., and Zhu, Z.: TransCom 3 inversion intercomparison: impact of transport model errors on the interannual variability of regional CO2 fluxes, 1988–2003, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 20, GB1002, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GB002439, 2006. 3. Balkanski, Y., Schulz, M., Claquin, T., and Guibert, S.: Reevaluation of Mineral aerosol radiative forcings suggests a better agreement with satellite and AERONET data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 81–95, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-81-2007, 2007. 4. Ballard, S. P., Golding, B. W., and Smith, R. N. B.: Mesoscale model experimental forecasts of the Haar of northeast Scotland, Mon. Weather Rev., 119, 2107–2123, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1991)1192.0.CO;2, 1991. 5. Beljaars, A. C. M. and Betts, A. K.: Validation of the boundary layer representation in the ECMWF model, in: ECMWF Seminar Proceedings, Reading, UK, Validation of models over Europe, Vol II, 7–11 September 1992, 159–195: available at: http://old.ecmwf.int/publications/library/ecpublications/_pdf/seminar/1992/validation2_beljaars.pdf (last access: 24 October 2014), 1992.
|
|