Future streamflow regime changes in the United States: assessment using functional classification
-
Published:2020-08-11
Issue:8
Volume:24
Page:3951-3966
-
ISSN:1607-7938
-
Container-title:Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.
Author:
Brunner Manuela I.ORCID, Melsen Lieke A., Newman Andrew J.ORCID, Wood Andrew W.ORCID, Clark Martyn P.
Abstract
Abstract. Streamflow regimes are changing and expected to further change under
the influence of climate change, with potential impacts on flow variability and the seasonality of extremes. However, not all types of
regimes are going to change in the same way. Climate change impact
assessments can therefore benefit from identifying classes of
catchments with similar streamflow regimes. Traditional catchment
classification approaches have focused on specific meteorological
and/or streamflow indices, usually neglecting the temporal information stored in the data. The aim of this study is 2-fold: (1) develop a catchment classification scheme that enables incorporation of such
temporal information and (2) use the scheme to evaluate changes in
future flow regimes. We use the developed classification scheme, which relies on a
functional data representation, to cluster a large set of catchments
in the conterminous United States (CONUS) according to their mean
annual hydrographs. We identify five regime classes that summarize the
behavior of catchments in the CONUS: (1) intermittent regime, (2) weak winter regime, (3) strong winter regime,
(4) New Year's regime, and (5) melt regime. Our
results show that these spatially contiguous classes are not only
similar in terms of their regimes, but also their flood and drought
behavior as well as their physiographical and meteorological characteristics. We therefore deem the functional regime classes
valuable for a number of applications going beyond change assessments, including model validation studies or predictions of streamflow
characteristics in ungauged basins. To assess future regime changes, we use simulated discharge time
series obtained from the Variable Infiltration Capacity hydrologic
model driven with meteorological time series generated by five general
circulation models. A comparison of the future regime classes derived
from these simulations with current classes shows that robust regime
changes are expected only for currently melt-influenced regions in the
Rocky Mountains. These changes in mountainous, upstream regions may
require adaption of water management strategies to ensure sufficient water supply in dependent downstream regions.
Highlights.
Functional data clustering enables formation of clusters of catchments with similar hydrological regimes and a similar drought and flood behavior. We identify five streamflow regime clusters: (1) intermittent regime, (2) weak winter regime, (3) strong winter regime, (4) New Year's regime, and (5) melt regime. Future regime changes are most pronounced for currently melt-dominated regimes in the Rocky Mountains. Functional regime clusters have widespread utility for predictions in
ungauged basins and hydroclimate analyses.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Engineering,General Environmental Science
Reference94 articles.
1. Adam, J. C., Hamlet, A. F., and Lettenmaier, D. P.: Implications of global
climate change for snowmelt hydrology in the twenty-first century,
Hydrol. Process., 23, 962–972, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7201, 2009. a, b 2. Addor, N., Rössler, O., Köplin, N., Huss, M., Weingartner, R., and
Seibert, J.: Robust changes and sources of uncertainty in the projected
hydrological regimes of Swiss catchments, Water Resour. Res., 50,
1–22, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR015549, 2014. a, b 3. Addor, N., Newman, A. J., Mizukami, N., and Clark, M. P.: The CAMELS data set: catchment attributes and meteorology for large-sample studies, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 5293–5313, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-5293-2017, 2017. a, b, c, d 4. Addor, N., Nearing, G., Prieto, C., Newman, A. J., Le Vine, N., and Clark, M. P.: A ranking of hydrological signatures based on their predictability in
space, Water Resour. Res., 54, 8792–8812, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR022606,
2018. a 5. Ali, G., Tetzlaff, D., Soulsby, C., McDonnell, J. J., and Capell, R.: A
comparison of similarity indices for catchment classification using a
cross-regional dataset, Adv. Water Resour., 40, 11–22,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.01.008, 2012. a, b
Cited by
55 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|