Author:
Zuraidi Siti Nor Fatimah,Rahman Mohammad Ashraf Abdul,Akasah Zainal Abidin
Abstract
This paper examines the criteria and attributes for assessing defects in a heritage building. The goal of this paper is to solve element type for building defects by using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). A survey questionnaire was develop based on the identified criteria and attributes of defect for a heritage building in Malaysia. The survey questionnaire was administered to consultants, academics, and contractors. A total of 20 expert panels was selected to determine the element of the defect in building performance. The sensitivity analysis of alternative ratings in respect to difference pairwise comparisons of the criteria and attribute was carried out. By changing one element in the pairwise comparison matrix, the process of defect element is monitored thus enabling possible improvements. An overall ranking of the Hierarchy priorities of criteria and attribute was a result of the AHP analysis. The result of the research is weightage for each criterion and its respective attributes. The criteria and attributes will be used as elements to develop a strategic heritage building performance procedure in Malaysia.
Reference13 articles.
1. Zuraidi S. N. F., Rahman M. A. A., & Akasah Z. A., Kriteria Penting Untuk Mengukur Keadaan Bangunan Warisan. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences, Vol. 1(1), 92-102. (2018)
2. Heritage Building Conservation in Malaysia: Experience and Challenges
3. Rahman M. A. A., Akasah Z. A. & Zuraidi S. N. F., An Analysis of Current Demographic Trends of Maintenance Personnel of A Heritage Buildings in Malaysia, International Journal of Advanced Science Engineering Information Technology, Vol.2 (2), (2012)
4. Saaty T. L., The Analytic Hierarchic Process. New York: McGraw Hill; 1980.
5. How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献