Tracing the outflow kinematics in Type 2 active galactic nuclei

Abstract

We used a sample of 577 spectra of active galactic nuclei Type 1.8-2 (z < 0.25) taken from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey to trace the influence of the outflow kinematics on the profiles of different emission lines (Hβ, [O III], Hα, [N II], [S II]). All considered lines were fitted with two Gaussian components: one that fits the core of the line, and another that fits the wings. We provide a procedure for decomposition of the Hα+[N II] wavelength band for spectra where these lines overlap. The influence of the gravitational and non-gravitational kinematics on the line components is investigated by comparing the dispersions of the line components with stellar velocity dispersion. We find that wing components of all the considered emission lines have pure non-gravitational kinematics. The core components are consistent with gravitational kinematics for the Hα, [N II], and [S II] lines, while in the [O III] there is evidence for contribution from non-gravitational kinematics. We adopted the wing components as a proxy for the outflow contribution and investigated the outflow kinematics by analysing the correlations between the widths and shifts of the wing components of different lines. For this purpose, we used the subsets in which wing components are detected in both compared lines, and can be fitted independently. We find strong correlations between wing component shifts, as well as between wing component widths of all considered lines, with the exception of the Hβ wing component width. These correlations indicate that outflow dynamics systemically affect all emission lines in the spectrum. However, it reflects with a different strength in their profiles, which is observed as different widths of the wing components. This is investigated by comparison of the mean widths of the wing components in subsets where wing components are present in all lines. The strongest outflow signature is observed in the [O III] lines, which have the broadest wing components; weaker outflow signatures are found in Hα and [N II], and the weakest is found for [S II]. These results imply that the considered lines arise in different parts of an outflowing region.