Exploring mass measurements of supermassive black holes in AGN using GAMA photometry and spectroscopy

Author:

Casura Sarah1ORCID,Ilić Dragana12ORCID,Targaczewski Jonathan1,Rakić Nemanja3ORCID,Liske Jochen1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Hamburger Sternwarte, Universität Hamburg , Gojenbergsweg 112, D-21029 Hamburg , Germany

2. Department of Astronomy, University of Belgrade – Faculty of Mathematics , Studentski trg 16, 11000 Belgrade , Serbia

3. Physics Department, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, University of Banjaluka , Mladena Stojanovića 2, 78000 Banjaluka, RS , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Abstract

ABSTRACT In the era of massive photometric surveys, we explore several approaches to estimate the masses of supermassive black holes (SMBHs) in active galactic nuclei (AGNs) from optical ground-based imaging, in each case comparing to the independent SMBH mass measurement obtained from spectroscopic data. We select a case-study sample of 28 type 1 AGN hosted by nearby galaxies from the Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA) survey. We perform multicomponent spectral decomposition, extract the AGN component, and calculate the SMBH mass from the broad H$\alpha$ emission line width and luminosity. The photometric g and i band data is decomposed into AGN+spheroid(+disc)(+bar) components with careful surface brightness fitting. From these, the SMBH mass is estimated using its relation with the spheroid Sérsic index or effective radius (both used for the first time on ground-based optical imaging of AGN); and the more widely used scaling relations based on bulge or galaxy stellar mass. We find no correlation between the H$\alpha$-derived SMBH masses and those based on the spheroid Sérsic index or effective radius, despite these being the most direct methods involving only one scaling relation. The bulge or galaxy stellar mass based methods both yield significant correlations, although with considerable scatter and, in the latter case, a systematic offset. We provide possible explanations for this and discuss the requirements, advantages, and drawbacks of each method. These considerations will be useful to optimize strategies for upcoming high quality ground-based and space-borne sky surveys to estimate SMBH masses in large numbers of AGN.

Funder

Science and Technology Facilities Council

Australian Research Council

Anglo-Australian Observatory

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3