Author:
Ouaderhman T., ,Chamlal H.,Oubaouzine A., ,
Abstract
Graph mining techniques have received a lot of attention to discover important subgraphs based on certain criteria. These techniques have become increasingly important due to the growing number of applications that rely on graph-based data. Some examples are: (i) microarray data analysis in bioinformatics, (ii) transportation network analysis, (iii) social network analysis. In this study, we propose a graph decomposition algorithm using the non-dominance criterion to identify important subgraphs based on two characteristics: edge connectivity and diameter. The proposed method uses a multi-objective optimization approach to maximize the edge connectivity and minimize the diameter. In a similar vein, identifying communities within a network can improve our comprehension of the network's characteristics and properties. Therefore, the detection of community structures in networks has been extensively studied. As a result, in this paper an innovative community detection method is presented based on our approach. The performance of the proposed technique is examined on both real-life and synthetically generated data sets.
Publisher
Lviv Polytechnic National University
Subject
Computational Theory and Mathematics,Computational Mathematics
Reference16 articles.
1. Rehman S. U., Asmat U. K., Simon F. Graph mining: A survey of graph mining techniques. Seventh International Conference on Digital Information Management (ICDIM 2012). 88-92 (2012).
2. Nandita B., Anmol R G. Graph-based data mining: A new approach for data analysis. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research. 5 (5), 1230-1236 (2014).
3. Papadias D., Tao Y., Fu G., Seeger B. Progressive skyline computation in database systems. ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS). 30 (1), 41-82 (2005).
4. Skygraph: an algorithm for important subgraph discovery in relational graphs;Papadopoulos;Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery,2008
5. Hartuv E., Shamir R. A clustering algorithm based on graph connectivity. Information Processing Letters. 76 (4-6), 175-181 (2000).