Social origins of risk semiotics

Author:

Shcherbin Vyacheslav K.

Abstract

The article examines the structure of the inter-relationship between society and its inherent risks, the main components of which are society’s accumulated experience in predicting and mitigating risks, the continuous complication of modern society and the new social risks it generates. The reasons for the formation of these components, the positive and negative results of their use by society are analyzed. The reactions of managers and scientists to existing social risks are described. The main difference between these reactions is the diametrically opposite attitude of managers and scientists to the phenomenon of reductionism in solving complex social problems. The article defines the role of interdisciplinary research areas (synergetics, systemology, the combined social analysis, science of science, etc.) in solving problems related to social risks. The proposed by A. G. Teslinov’s classification of existing worlds (the material world, the world of ideas, the social world and the world of signs) correlates with traditional disciplinary classifications. The place of a new scientific direction (risk semiotics) in the system of existing risk sciences, as well as among other artificial semiotics is established. The conclusion about the need for interrelated development of social semiotics and risk semiotics is substantiated.

Publisher

Belarusian State University

Reference33 articles.

1. Shcherbin VK. Creation of marginal problems in various knowledge branches as an indicator of growing austerity of lifeworld of personality and society. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Sociology. 2017;1:19–35. Russian.

2. Beck U. Was ist globalisierung? Irrtümer des Globalismus – Antworten auf Globalisierung. Berlin: Suhrkamp; 1997. 269 S. Russian edition: Beck U. Chto takoe globalizatsiya? Oshibki globalizma – otvety na globalizatsiyu. Grigoryev A, Sedelnik V, translators. Мoscow: Progress-Traditsiya; 2001. 301 p.

3. Janitskii ON. The fourth technological revolution and deep shifts in globalization processes. Vestnik Instituta sotsiologii. 2017;8(2):12–34. Russian. DOI: 10.19181/vis.2017.21.2.452.

4. Gigerenzer G. Risk Savvy. How to make good decisions. New York: Penguin Books; 2014. 336 p. Russian edition: Gigerenzer G. Ponimat’ riski. Kak vybirat’ pravil’nyi put’. К uzin A, translator. Мoscow: КоLibri; 2015. 352 p. Co-published by the «Аzbuka-Аttikus».

5. Harari YuN. Sapiens. A brief history of mankind. [S. l.]: Harper; 2015. 464 p. Russian edition: Harari YuN. Sapiens. Кratkaya istoriya chelovechestva. Summ L, translator. Moscow: Sindbad; 2018. 512 p.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3