Affiliation:
1. School of Global Health and Bioethics, Euclid University, Banjul, The Gambia
Abstract
<i>Aim</i>: This study aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the Annual Operational Planning (AOP) process, a key health sector planning and harmonization approach, in Kebbi State, Nigeria, from 2020 to 2024, focusing on nine optimal planning parameters: state ownership, stakeholder participation, sector harmonization, evidence-based, timeliness, executive sign-off, quarterly tracking, dissemination, and sustainability. <i>Methods</i>: Review of AOP program reports, state-relevant reports, and stakeholders’ interviews. Employing a mixed-methods research design, the study integrates quantitative data derived from secondary sources like annual reports and policy documents with qualitative data from semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders. Descriptive statistics and time-series analysis are used for quantitative data to study progress and trends in each milestone, while thematic analysis of interview transcripts helps to elucidate factors influencing implementation and outcomes. <i>Results:</i> Findings highlight a progressive improvement in the annual operational planning across several of the planning parameters over the years from the baseline in 2020, including in participatory engagement of the lower levels of the health sector (bottom-up approach), using evidence to inform planning; timely development of the AOP to inform health budget; and regular tracking of the plan. However, challenges persist in the government funding of stakeholders’ engagement, particularly the bottom-up approach at the Local Government Health Authorities (LGAs) level, which may affect the inclusiveness of the process in the future. <i>Conclusion</i>: The study concludes that the annual operational planning in Kebbi State has seen notable improvement across multiple planning parameters, assuring the effectiveness and sustainability of the process as a key planning tool. However, allocating adequate resources, including budget and human resources, to facilitate a participatory approach in the AOP development process is critical for continuous success. This study contributes to the broader discourse on health sector planning in developing contexts, offering valuable insights for policymakers, health managers, and stakeholders in designing and implementing effective and harmonized health plans.
Reference20 articles.
1. Corlis, Joseph, et al. "A roadmap for implementing change in costing capacity and practices: Improving cost analyses of HIV services and the use of cost information in strategic planning and program management." Gates Open Res 6.71 (2022): 71. https://gatesopenresearch.org/documents/6-71/pdf
2. Health Organization, W. "Guidance on developing a national deployment and vaccination plan for COVID-19 vaccines: interim guidance, 1 June 2021." 2021. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/341564/WHO-2019-nCoV-Vaccine-deployment-2021.1-eng.pdf?sequence=1
3. Health Organization, W. "Pandemic influenza preparedness framework: partnership contribution high-level implementation plan III 2024-2030." 2023. https://books.google.com.ng/books?hl=en&lr=&id=pky7EAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR5&dq=The+Annual+Operational+Plan+(AOP)+is+one+such+strategic+tool+universally+recognized+for+its+role+in+providing+a+clear+roadmap+for+health+initiatives+within+a+particular+timeframe&ots=EXMEJIYrQq&sig=_5Fwh47W0CPgt6jYH-we8jl5Mxc&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
4. Ede, James D., et al. "Translating scientific advances in the AOP framework to decision making for nanomaterials." Nanomaterials 10.6 (2020): 1229. https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/10/6/1229/pdf
5. Chauhan, Vinita, et al. "Bringing together scientific disciplines for collaborative undertakings: a vision for advancing the adverse outcome pathway framework." International Journal of Radiation Biology 97.4 (2021): 431-441. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09553002.2021.1884314