Timing of microsurgical resection for ruptured brain arteriovenous malformations: a propensity score–matched analysis using prospective single-center registry data
Author:
Zhang Yukun123, Chen Yu12, Han Heze12, Ma Li12, Li Ruinan12, Li Zhipeng12, Yan Debin4, Zhang Haibin12, Yuan Kexin12, Wang Ke12, Zhao Yang3, Jin Weitao3, Jin Hengwei5, Meng Xiangyu6, Li Runting12, Lin Fa12, Hao Qiang12, Wang Hao12, Ye Xun12, Kang Shuai12, Gao Dezhi7, Sun Shibin7, Liu Ali7, Li Youxiang5, Chen Xiaolin12, Wang Shuo12, Zhao Yuanli12
Affiliation:
1. Departments of Neurosurgery and 2. China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing; 3. Department of Neurosurgery, Peking University International Hospital, Beijing; 4. Department of Neurosurgery, Shanxi Provincial People’s Hospital, Taiyuan, Shanxi; 5. Interventional Neuroradiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing; 6. Department of Neurosurgery, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei; and 7. Department of Gamma-Knife Center, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
The optimal microsurgical timing in ruptured brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) is not well understood and is surrounded by controversy. This study aimed to elucidate the impacts of microsurgical resection timing on clinical outcomes.
METHODS
The authors retrieved and reviewed the records on all ruptured AVMs treated at their institution and registered in a nationwide multicenter prospective collaboration registry between August 2011 and August 2021. Patients were dichotomized into an early resection group (≤ 30 days from the last hemorrhagic stroke) and a delayed resection group (> 30 days after the last hemorrhagic stroke). Propensity score–matched analysis was used to compare long-term outcomes. The primary outcome was neurological status as assessed using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). The secondary outcomes were complete obliteration rate, postoperative seizure, and postoperative hemorrhage.
RESULTS
Of the 3649 consecutive AVMs treated at the authors’ institution, a total of 558 ruptured AVMs were microsurgically resected and had long-term follow-up. After propensity score matching, 390 ruptured AVMs (195 pairs) were included in the comparison of outcomes. The mean (± standard deviation) clinical follow-up duration was 4.93 ± 2.94 years in the early resection group and 5.61 ± 2.56 years in the delayed resection group. Finally, as regards the distribution of mRS scores, short-term neurological outcomes were better in the delayed resection group (risk difference [RD] 0.3%, 95% CI −0.1% to 0.6%, p = 0.010), whereas long-term neurological outcomes were similar between the two groups (RD 0.0%, 95% CI −0.2% to 0.2%, p = 0.906). Long-term favorable neurological outcomes (early vs delayed: 90.8% vs 90.3%, p > 0.999; RD 0.5%, 95% CI −5.8% to 6.9%; RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.94–1.07) and long-term disability (9.2% vs 9.7%, p > 0.999; RD −0.5%, 95% CI −6.9% to 5.8%; RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.51–1.75) were also similar between these groups. In terms of secondary outcomes, postoperative seizure (early vs delayed: 8.7% vs 5.6%, p = 0.239; RD 3.1%, 95% CI −2.6% to 8.8%; RR 1.55, 95% CI 0.74–3.22), postoperative hemorrhage (1.0% vs 1.0%, p > 0.999; RD 0.0%, 95% CI −3.1% to 3.1%; RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.14–7.04), and hospitalization time (16.4 ± 8.5 vs 19.1 ± 7.9 days, p = 0.793) were similar between the two groups, whereas early resection had a lower complete obliteration rate (91.3% vs 99.0%, p = 0.001; RD −7.7%, 95% CI −12.9% to 3.1%; RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.88–0.97).
CONCLUSIONS
Early and delayed resection of ruptured AVMs had similar long-term neurological outcomes. Delayed resection can lead to a higher complete obliteration rate, although the risk of rerupture during the resection waiting period should be vigilantly monitored.
Publisher
Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)
Subject
Genetics,Animal Science and Zoology
Reference27 articles.
1. Brain arteriovenous malformations: a review of natural history, pathobiology, and interventions;Chen CJ,2020 2. Management of brain arteriovenous malformations: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association;Derdeyn CP,2017 3. Expert consensus on the management of brain arteriovenous malformations;Kato Y,2019 4. Clinical practice. Arteriovenous malformations of the brain;Friedlander RM,2007 5. Timing of surgery for ruptured supratentorial arteriovenous malformations;Hafez A,2017
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|