The Isolation of Reticulocyte-Free Human Red Blood Cells

Author:

Goodman Steven R.1,Hughes Karis M. H.1,Kakhniashvili David G.1,Neelam Sudha1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas 75083; Southwestern Sickle Cell Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75390; and Department of Cell Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75390

Abstract

We depleted reticulocytes from erythrocytes of both sickle cell disease (SCD) subjects and healthy controls by four methods: fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS), Miltenyi immunomagnetic depletion (MACS), a combination of these methods (FACS + MACS) and Percoll density separation. The efficiency of these methods was assessed by new methylene blue staining and manual enumeration of the reticulocytes. FACS sorted erythrocytes from reticulocytes based on size and granularity, as well as the absence of dsDNA staining. MACS depleted reticulocytes from erythrocytes based on the immunoaffinity to CD36 and CD71. Reticulocytes from healthy controls were depleted to ≤0.1% using either the FACS or MACS method (α = 0.1). Reticulocytes from SCD subjects were depleted from 13.6% ± 0.52% to 5.45% ± 0.33% using MACS (n = 2), and from 10.9% ± 0.47% to 2.0% ± 0.2% using FACS (n = 4, α = 0.05). When combining FACS with MACS (n=3), the percentage of reticulocytes was decreased in SCD samples from 13.0% ± 0.51% down to 1.5% ± 0.17% (α = 0.1). Sedimentation through 75% percoll resulted in control and SCD samples being reduced from 0.27% ± 0.6 (control) and 6.93% ± 0.8 (SCD) reticulocytes to < 4.8 reticulocytes per million control RBCs and <2.5 per million SCD RBCs. This same method results in <2.1 leukocytes per million control RBCs and <3.7 per million SCD RBCs. We conclude that the percoll density method described here is the most effective method for isolating RBCs for proteomic analysis.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Cited by 15 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3