The Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of a Universal Digital Parenting Intervention Designed and Implemented During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence From a Rapid-Implementation Randomized Controlled Trial Within a Cohort (Preprint)

Author:

Palmer MelanieORCID,Beckley-Hoelscher NicholasORCID,Shearer JamesORCID,Kostyrka-Allchorne KatarzynaORCID,Robertson OllyORCID,Koch MartaORCID,Pearson OliverORCID,Slovak PetrORCID,Day CrispinORCID,Byford SarahORCID,Goldsmith KimberleyORCID,Waite PollyORCID,Creswell CathyORCID,Sonuga-Barke Edmund J SORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Children’s conduct and emotional problems increased during the COVID-19 pandemic.

OBJECTIVE

We tested whether a smartphone parenting support app, <i>Parent Positive</i>, developed specifically for this purpose, reversed these effects in a cost-effective way. <i>Parent Positive</i> includes 3 zones. <i>Parenting Boosters</i> (zone 1) provided content adapted from standard face-to-face parent training programs to tackle 8 specific challenges identified by parents and parenting experts as particularly relevant for parents during the pandemic. The <i>Parenting Exchange</i> (zone 2) was a parent-to-parent and parent-to-expert communication forum. <i>Parenting Resources</i> (zone 3) provided access to existing high-quality web-based resources on a range of additional topics of value to parents (eg, neurodevelopmental problems, diet, and sleep).

METHODS

Supporting Parents And Kids Through Lockdown Experiences (SPARKLE), a randomized controlled trial, was embedded in the UK-wide COVID-19: Supporting Parents, Adolescents and Children during Epidemics (Co-SPACE) longitudinal study on families’ mental health during the pandemic. Parents of children aged 4 to 10 years were randomized 1:1 to <i>Parent Positive</i> or follow-up as usual (FAU) between May 19, 2021, and July 26, 2021. <i>Parent Positive</i> provided advice on common parenting challenges and evidence-based web-based resources and facilitated parent-to-parent and expert-to-parent support. Child conduct and emotional problems and family well-being were measured before randomization (T1) and at 1 (T2) and 2 (T3) months after randomization. Service use, costs, and adverse events were measured, along with app use and satisfaction. The primary outcome was T2 parent-reported child conduct problems, which were analyzed using linear mixed regression models.

RESULTS

A total of 320 participants were randomized to <i>Parent Positive</i>, and 326 were randomized to FAU. The primary outcome analysis included 79.3% (512/646) of the participants (dropout: 84/320, 26% on <i>Parent Positive</i> and 50/326, 15% on FAU). There were no statistically significant intervention effects on conduct problems at either T2 (standardized effect=−0.01) or T3 (secondary outcome; standardized effect=−0.09) and no moderation by baseline conduct problems. Significant intervention-related reductions in emotional problems were observed at T2 and T3 (secondary outcomes; standardized effect=−0.13 in both cases). <i>Parent Positive</i>, relative to FAU, was associated with more parental worries at T3 (standardized effect=0.14). Few intervention-attributable adverse events were reported. <i>Parent Positive</i> was cost-effective once 4 outliers with extremely high health care costs were excluded.

CONCLUSIONS

<i>Parent Positive</i> reduced child emotional problems and was cost-effective compared with FAU once outliers were removed. Although small when considered against targeted therapeutic interventions, the size of these effects was in line with trials of nontargeted universal mental health interventions. This highlights the public health potential of <i>Parent Positive</i> if implemented at the community level. Nevertheless, caution is required before making such an interpretation, and the findings need to be replicated in large-scale, whole-community studies.

CLINICALTRIAL

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04786080; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04786080

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3