Social Media as a Platform for Cancer Care Decision Making: A Survey-Based Study on Trust, Engagement, and Preferences (Preprint)

Author:

Johnson Anna RoseORCID,Longfellow Grace AnneORCID,Lee ClaraORCID,Ormseth BenjaminORCID,Skolnick GaryORCID,Politi MaryORCID,Rivera YonairaORCID,Myckatyn TerenceORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Decision aids can improve patient and clinician decision making but are underused and restricted to clinical settings.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the potential dissemination of health decision aids through digital platforms and social media.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was conducted in February 2023 using an online platform. Descriptive statistics evaluated demographics, health and cancer information-seeking behaviors, and social media trust and usage. Correlation and non-parametric tests analyzed relationships between these variables and likelihood to view health information or access decision aids online.

RESULTS

Of 607 respondents, 65.4% had searched for cancer information. Of these 46.6% had used the internet for their primary source of cancer information. Facebook was the most popular social media platform, used by 84.2% of respondents. Trust in social media for health information was higher among those of Black or Asian race (p=0.003), younger age (p<0.001), and fewer years as a United States resident (p=0.004). Trust in social media for health information was associated with a higher likelihood of viewing online health information and accessing a decision aid online (p<0.001). Younger age was associated with increased online health seeking behavior (p=0.008). Social media engagement was associated with increased online health seeking behavior (ρ=0.20 p<0.001) and willingness to access an online decision aid (ρ=0.21, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Social media platforms hold promise for increasing accessibility of evidence-based health information and decision aids. Future research should evaluate the use of social media with patient populations. The nuanced relationship(s) between trust and digital media use should be explored to optimize content delivery.

CLINICALTRIAL

None

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3