Effectiveness of a Decision Aid Plus Standard Care in Surgical Management Among Patients With Early Breast Cancer

Author:

Joshi Shalaka12,Ramarajan Lakshmi3,Ramarajan Naresh4,Lee Serenity S.5,Deshpande Ojas6,Fernandes Elizabeth6,Engineer Mitchelle1,Srivastava Gitika4,Vanmali Vaibhav6,Kannan Sadhana6,Hawaldar Rohini6,Nair Nita1,Parmar Vani1,Thakkar Purvi1,Chitkara Garvit1,Gupta Sudeep7,Badwe Rajendra1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, and Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India

2. Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India

3. Harvard Business School, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts

4. Navya Network, Cambridge, Massachusetts

5. The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia

6. Clinical Research Secretariat, Tata Memorial Centre and Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India

7. Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, and Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India

Abstract

ImportancePatients with early breast cancer must choose between undergoing breast conservation surgery or mastectomy. This decision is often difficult as there are trade-offs between breast conservation and adverse effects, and women with higher decisional conflict have a harder time choosing the therapy that suits their preferences.ObjectiveTo study the impact of a decision aid with a patient preference assessment tool for surgical decision-making on patients’ decisional conflict scale (DCS) score.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis 3-group randomized clinical trial was conducted between June 2017 and December 2019 at a single high-volume tertiary care cancer center in Mumbai, India. A research questionnaire comprising 16 questions answered on a Likert scale (from 1, strongly agree, to 5, strongly disagree) was used to measure DCS scores and other secondary psychological variables, with higher scores indicating more decisional conflict. The Navya Patient Preference Tool (Navya-PPT) was developed as a survey-based presentation of evidence in an adaptive, conjoint analysis-based module for and trade-offs between cosmesis, adverse effects of radiotherapy, and cost of mandatory radiation following breast-conserving surgery. Adult patients with histologically proven early breast cancer (cT1-2, N0-1) who were eligible for breast-conserving surgery as per clinicoradiological assessment were included. Those who were pregnant or unable to read the research questionnaire or who had bilateral breast cancer were excluded. Data were analyzed from January to June 2020.InterventionsPatients were randomized 1:1:1 to study groups: standard care including clinical explanation about surgery (control), standard care plus the Navya-PPT provided to the patient alone (solo group), and standard care plus the Navya-PPT provided to the patient and a caregiver (joint group).Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary end point of the study was DCS score. The study was 80% powered with 2-sided α = .01 to detect an effect size of 0.25 measured by Cohen d, F test analysis of variance, and fixed effects.ResultsA total of 245 female patients (median [range] age, 48 [23-76] years) were randomized (82 to control, 83 to the solo group, and 80 to the joint group). The median (range) pathological tumor size was 2.5 (0-6) cm. A total of 153 participants (62.4%) had pN0 disease, 185 (75.5%) were hormone receptor positive, 197 (80.4%) were human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative, 144 (58.6%) were of middle or lower socioeconomic status, and 114 (46.5%) had an education level lower than a college degree. DCS score was significantly reduced in the solo group compared with control (1.34 vs 1.66, respectively; Cohen d, 0.50; SD, 0.31; P < .001) and the joint group compared with control (1.31 vs 1.66, respectively; Cohen d, 0.54; SD, 0.31; P < .001).Conclusions and RelevanceThe results of this study demonstrated lower decisional conflict as measured by DCS score following use of the online, self-administered Navya-PPT among patients with early breast cancer choosing between breast-conserving surgery vs mastectomy.Trial RegistrationClinical Trials Registry of India Identifier: CTRI/2017/11/010480

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3