Multidisciplinary view of INtimacy, PRIvacy and COnfidentiality (INPRICO) in local primary health care practices using the INPRICO rural survey during COVID-19: protocol for a cross-sectional descriptive study. (Preprint)

Author:

Panadés Zafra RobertORCID,Torrents Comas Maria Teresa,Caballero Humet Isabel,Aymerich Mestre Anna,Panadés Zafra Mercè,Grau Vila Josep Lluis,Merino Martínez Cristina,Homs Riba MariaORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Confidentiality is a fundamental right in health care, reaffirmed by the World Medical Association Declaration of Geneva. Every person has the fundamental right to privacy, intimacy and confidentiality.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the perception of confidentiality, intimacy and privacy in primary health care (PHC), in local clinics and in a multidisciplinary context.

METHODS

Cross-sectional descriptive study of PHC professionals and users in rural areas. An anonymous Likert scale survey (called INPRICO) will be applied and the answers will be digitised with Teleform©. Professionals and users’ perceptions will be compared by means of the INPRICO questionnaire.

RESULTS

This study investigates intimacy, privacy, and confidentiality in primary health care. A higher participation of women and the 45-64 age group is expected. With a higher age, a lower perception of privacy is expected. Differences will be found in genital intimacy and pandemic impact, but not in confidentiality. Users are likely to be more accepting of professionals' access to their data because of the pandemic. There will be no significant differences according to place of birth. In general, we believe that they will be of the opinion that it not necessary for the administrative team to have access to health data. This study provides relevant information on attitudes and perceptions of these aspects in primary health care.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the sensitivity of the subject, there is a lack of exploration of this area. The INPRICO questionnaire can be a useful tool for assessing these aspects, but it needs to be validated. These aspects have worsened during the COVID-19 pandemic. More studies are needed to further investigate these aspects.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3