Public attitudes to the use of routinely and non-routinely collected healthcare data in dementia and brain health research. (Preprint)

Author:

Gregory SarahORCID,Killin Lewis,Pullen Hannah,Dolan Clare,Hunter Matthew,Welstead Miles,Ritchie Craig William

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Background: Harnessing the power of big data has unexplored potential in the field of dementia and brain health research. However, as interest in big data increases it is important to learn what the public understands about the use of their routinely collected healthcare data for research purposes, and their attitudes to such use. Participants’ data is increasingly collected in studies with open-data access processes in place, and through informed consent processes, participants show their willingness to share their data in this way. There remains an inherent flaw in research studies whereby the participants may not reflect the population at large representing a sampling bias. Access to medical records allows research studies to include a wholly representative sample.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to explore attitudes held by members of the public on the use of their healthcare data for dementia research purposes.

METHODS

Methods: Data was collected in a series of focus groups with semi-structured discussions. Transcripts from the focus groups were analysed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Results: Participants reported a willingness for their anonymised healthcare data to be accessed and used for research purposes, with some caveats for identifiable or highly sensitive data. Participants were happier for trusted organisations, such as the UK’s National Health Service and universities, to access their data compared to pharmaceutical companies. Clear and transparent communication about both the use of healthcare data in research studies and about study results was highlighted as important to participants. There was general misunderstanding about what healthcare data included and how researchers use healthcare data.

CONCLUSIONS

Conclusions: Overall, our findings underline the importance of clear communication to build trust and understand in the public about how their healthcare data can be used to support high quality dementia and brain health focussed data research.

CLINICALTRIAL

NA

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3