Integrating Patient-Generated Digital Data into Mental Health Therapy: A mixed methods analysis of user experience (Preprint)

Author:

Southwick LaurenORCID,Sharma Meghana,Rai Sunny,Beidas Rinad S.,Mandell David S.,Asch David A.,Curtis Brenda,Guntuku Sharath Chandra,Merchant Raina M.

Abstract

UNSTRUCTURED

Therapists and their patients increasingly discuss digital data from social media, smartphone sensors, and other online engagement within the context of psychotherapy. We examined patients’ and mental health therapists’ experiences and perceptions following a randomized controlled trial (RCT) in which they both received regular summaries of patients’ digital data (e.g., dashboard) to review and discuss in session. The dashboard included data which patients consented to share from their social media posts, phone usage and online searches. Following the RCT, patient (n=56) and therapist (n=44) participants completed a debriefing survey after their study completion (from December 2021 - January 2022). Participants were asked about their experience receiving a digital data dashboard in psychotherapy via closed- and open-ended questions. We calculated descriptive statistics for closed-ended questions and conducted qualitative coding via NVivo 10 and natural language processing using the machine learning tool Latent Dirichlet Allocation to analyze open-ended questions. Of 100 participants, nearly half (49%) described their experience with the dashboard as “positive,” while the other half noted a “neutral” experience. Responses to the open-ended questions resulted in three thematic areas (9 sub-categories): (1) dashboard experience (positive; neutral or negative; comfortable), (2) perception of the dashboard’s impact on enhancing therapy (accountability; increased awareness over time; objectivity), and (3) dashboard refinements (additional sources; tailored content; ethics). Patients reported that receiving their digital data helped them stay “accountable,” while therapists indicated that dashboard helped “tailor treatment plans.” Patient and therapist surveys provided important feedback their experience regularly discussing dashboards in psychotherapy.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3