Acceptability of Online Mental Health Interventions in the Workplace: A Systematic Review (Preprint)

Author:

Scheutzow JohannaORCID,Attoe ChrisORCID,Harwood JoshuaORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Online interventions are not only proven to be effective in clinical populations but also in the occupational setting. Recent studies conducted in the work environment focus on the effectiveness of these interventions. However, the role of employees’ acceptability of online interventions and programs has not yet enjoyed a similar level of attention.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this systematic review was to conduct the first comprehensive study on employees’ level of acceptability of online mental health interventions based on direct and indirect measures, outline the utility of different types of online interventions for work-related mental health issues, and build a research-base in the field.

METHODS

The search was conducted between October 2018 and July 2019 and allowed any study design. Studies used either qualitative or quantitative data sources. Online interventions were generally aimed at supporting employees with their mental health issues. The study characteristics were outlined in a table as well as marked based on their quality with a traffic light schema. Level of acceptability was individually rated with commonly applied methods including percentile quartiles ranging from low to very high.

RESULTS

A total of 1296 studies were identified through multiple database searches and additional resources from which 28 studies were rated to be eligible for the synthesis. Results of employees’ acceptability levels were mixed and studies very heterogenous in design, intervention characteristics, and population. Ten studies outlined a very high acceptability level while other ten studies reported a moderate to low level of acceptability. Qualitative studies also provided insights into barriers and preferences including simple and tailored application tools as well as the preference for non-stigmatized language. However, there were multiple flaws in the methodology of studies such as for instance blinding of participants and personnel.

CONCLUSIONS

The results outline the need for further research with more homogenous acceptability studies to draw a final conclusion. However, the underlying results show that there is a tendency for general acceptability of online interventions in the workplace, with findings of general applicability to the use of online mental health interventions.

CLINICALTRIAL

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3