Abstract
BackgroundContact tracing has been globally adopted in the fight to control the infection rate of COVID-19. To this aim, several mobile apps have been developed. However, there are ever-growing concerns over the working mechanism and performance of these applications. The literature already provides some interesting exploratory studies on the community’s response to the applications by analyzing information from different sources, such as news and users’ reviews of the applications. However, to the best of our knowledge, there is no existing solution that automatically analyzes users’ reviews and extracts the evoked sentiments. We believe such solutions combined with a user-friendly interface can be used as a rapid surveillance tool to monitor how effective an application is and to make immediate changes without going through an intense participatory design method.ObjectiveIn this paper, we aim to analyze the efficacy of AI and NLP techniques for automatically extracting and classifying the polarity of users’ sentiments by proposing a sentiment analysis framework to automatically analyze users’ reviews on COVID-19 contact tracing mobile apps. We also aim to provide a large-scale annotated benchmark data set to facilitate future research in the domain. As a proof of concept, we also developed a web application based on the proposed solutions, which is expected to help the community quickly analyze the potential of an application in the domain.MethodsWe propose a pipeline starting from manual annotation via a crowd-sourcing study and concluding with the development and training of artificial intelligence (AI) models for automatic sentiment analysis of users’ reviews. In detail, we collected and annotated a large-scale data set of user reviews on COVID-19 contact tracing applications. We used both classical and deep learning methods for classification experiments.ResultsWe used 8 different methods on 3 different tasks, achieving up to an average F1 score of 94.8%, indicating the feasibility of the proposed solution. The crowd-sourcing activity resulted in a large-scale benchmark data set composed of 34,534 manually annotated reviews.ConclusionsThe existing literature mostly relies on the manual or exploratory analysis of users’ reviews on applications, which is tedious and time-consuming. In existing studies, generally, data from fewer applications are analyzed. In this work, we showed that AI and natural language processing techniques provide good results for analyzing and classifying users’ sentiments’ polarity and that automatic sentiment analysis can help to analyze users’ responses more accurately and quickly. We also provided a large-scale benchmark data set. We believe the presented analysis, data set, and proposed solutions combined with a user-friendly interface can be used as a rapid surveillance tool to analyze and monitor mobile apps deployed in emergency situations leading to rapid changes in the applications without going through an intense participatory design method.
Subject
Health Informatics,Medicine (miscellaneous)
Reference41 articles.
1. Effectiveness of isolation, testing, contact tracing, and physical distancing on reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in different settings: a mathematical modelling study
2. WetsmanNContact tracing apps promised big and didn’t deliverThe Verge202012112021-01-27https://www.theverge.com/22168473/coronavirus-contact-tracing-apps-exposure-notification-covid-google-apple.com/y3a83l65
3. Sentiment analysis of user feedback on the HSE’s Covid-19 contact tracing app
4. Contact tracing: Can ‘Big tech’ come to the rescue, and if so, at what cost?
5. HinchRProbertWNurtayAKendallMWymantCHallMLythgoeKCruzAZhaoLStewartAFerrettiLParkerMMerouehAMathiasBStevensonSMonteroDWarrenJMatherNKFinkelsteinAAbeler-DornerLBonsallDFraserCEffective configurations of a digital contact tracing app: A report to NHSXThe Conversation202004162022-04-23https://cdn.theconversation.com/static_files/files/1009/Report_-_Effective_App_Configurations.pdf?1587531217
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献