Changes in Food Insecurity Among Individuals Using a Telehealth and Nutrition Platform: Longitudinal Study

Author:

Bakre ShivaniORCID,Shea BenjaminORCID,Ortega KayleeORCID,Scharen JaredORCID,Langheier JasonORCID,Hu EmilyORCID

Abstract

Background Food insecurity is a complex public health problem affecting many individuals in the United States. Digital health interventions that promote behavior change and provide access to affordable and healthy food may help to alleviate food insecurity. Objective The aim of this study was to characterize food-insecure users of Foodsmart, a telehealth and nutrition platform with meal planning, food ordering, nutrition education, budgeting, and grocery discount features, and to evaluate changes in diet and food insecurity. Methods We retrospectively analyzed data collected from 4595 adults who used the Foodsmart platform between February and October 2021. Participants self-reported their diet, demographics, biometrics, and food insecurity status in a 56-item questionnaire. Participants were reported to be food insecure if they answered “sometimes” or “often” to the question “How often does the food you buy not last and you don't have money to get more?” from the United States Department of Agriculture’s Household Food Security survey. We examined baseline characteristics of participants by food insecurity status, associations between characteristics and baseline food insecurity, and changes in diet quality and food insecurity status. To evaluate potential causes of reversing food insecurity, the use of 6 Foodsmart features was compared between food-insecure participants who achieved food security versus food-insecure participants who remained food insecure, based on their last response to the food insecurity question. Results We found that 16% (742/4595) of participants were food insecure at baseline. Participants who were food insecure at baseline were more likely to be obese, to have at least one chronic condition, to have a lower diet quality, to cook less frequently at home, to think healthy food is too expensive, and less likely to order takeout or eat at a restaurant. Among participants who were food insecure at baseline, 61% (451/742) improved their nutrition and 29% (217/742) responded that they were food secure at follow-up, with an increasing percentage achieving food security with longer enrollment time. Using a multivariable logistic regression model, we found that age, diabetes, prediabetes, BMI categories, and diet quality at baseline were statistically significantly associated with the likelihood of being food insecure at baseline. Among those who were food insecure at baseline, there was a higher relative proportion of participants who achieved food security and used the “deals” (28.6% higher), “CookItNow” (36.4% higher), and “telenutrition” (27.5% higher) features compared to those who remained food insecure. Conclusions This study assesses the characteristics of individuals enrolled on the Foodsmart platform who answered the food insecurity question. We found that a significant number of participants who were food insecure at enrollment achieved food security. This finding shows that telehealth and nutrition platforms may potentially help users improve household food security.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

Subject

Health Informatics,Medicine (miscellaneous)

Reference36 articles.

1. State-Level and County-Level Estimates of Health Care Costs Associated with Food Insecurity

2. Coleman-JensenARabbittMGregoryCSinghAHousehold Food Security in the United States in 2019, ERR-275Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture2022-10-01https://www.ers.usda.gov/webdocs/publications/99282/err-275.pdf?v=6570.3

3. FitzpatrickKHarrisCDrawveGAssessing U.S. Food Insecurity in the United States during COVID-19 PandemicUniversity of Arkansas2022-10-01https://fulbright.uark.edu/departments/sociology/research-centers/community-family-institute/_resources/community-and-family-institute/revised-assessing-food-insecurity-brief.pdf

4. The COVID-19, Obesity, and Food Insecurity Syndemic

5. LakhaniN'A perfect storm': US facing hunger crisis as demand for food banks soarsThe Guardian2022-10-01https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/apr/02/us-food-banks-coronavirus-demand-unemployment

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3