Abstract
Background
Asthma hospital encounters impose a heavy burden on the health care system. To improve preventive care and outcomes for patients with asthma, we recently developed a black-box machine learning model to predict whether a patient with asthma will have one or more asthma hospital encounters in the succeeding 12 months. Our model is more accurate than previous models. However, black-box machine learning models do not explain their predictions, which forms a barrier to widespread clinical adoption. To solve this issue, we previously developed a method to automatically provide rule-based explanations for the model’s predictions and to suggest tailored interventions without sacrificing model performance. For an average patient correctly predicted by our model to have future asthma hospital encounters, our explanation method generated over 5000 rule-based explanations, if any. However, the user of the automated explanation function, often a busy clinician, will want to quickly obtain the most useful information for a patient by viewing only the top few explanations. Therefore, a methodology is required to appropriately rank the explanations generated for a patient. However, this is currently an open problem.
Objective
The aim of this study is to develop a method to appropriately rank the rule-based explanations that our automated explanation method generates for a patient.
Methods
We developed a ranking method that struck a balance among multiple factors. Through a secondary analysis of 82,888 data instances of adults with asthma from the University of Washington Medicine between 2011 and 2018, we demonstrated our ranking method on the test case of predicting asthma hospital encounters in patients with asthma.
Results
For each patient predicted to have asthma hospital encounters in the succeeding 12 months, the top few explanations returned by our ranking method typically have high quality and low redundancy. Many top-ranked explanations provide useful insights on the various aspects of the patient’s situation, which cannot be easily obtained by viewing the patient’s data in the current electronic health record system.
Conclusions
The explanation ranking module is an essential component of the automated explanation function, and it addresses the interpretability issue that deters the widespread adoption of machine learning predictive models in clinical practice. In the next few years, we plan to test our explanation ranking method on predictive modeling problems addressing other diseases as well as on data from other health care systems.
International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)
RR2-10.2196/5039
Subject
Health Information Management,Health Informatics
Reference55 articles.
1. Most recent National Asthma DataCenters for Disease Control and Prevention20202021-01-29https://www.cdc.gov/asthma/most_recent_national_asthma_data.htm
2. Chronic respiratory diseases: asthmaWorld Health Organization20202021-01-31https://www.who.int/news-room/q-a-detail/chronic-respiratory-diseases-asthma
3. The Economic Burden of Asthma in the United States, 2008–2013
4. Managed Care Rebound? Recent Changes In Health Plans' Cost Containment Strategies
5. Computer-based Models to Identify High-risk Children with Asthma