Best Practice Guidance for Digital Contact Tracing Apps: A Cross-disciplinary Review of the Literature

Author:

O'Connell JamesORCID,Abbas ManzarORCID,Beecham SarahORCID,Buckley JimORCID,Chochlov MuslimORCID,Fitzgerald BrianORCID,Glynn LiamORCID,Johnson KevinORCID,Laffey JohnORCID,McNicholas BairbreORCID,Nuseibeh BasharORCID,O'Callaghan MichaelORCID,O'Keeffe IanORCID,Razzaq AbdulORCID,Rekanar KaavyaORCID,Richardson ItaORCID,Simpkin AndrewORCID,Storni CristianoORCID,Tsvyatkova DamyankaORCID,Walsh JaneORCID,Welsh ThomasORCID,O'Keeffe DerekORCID

Abstract

Background Digital contact tracing apps have the potential to augment contact tracing systems and disrupt COVID-19 transmission by rapidly identifying secondary cases prior to the onset of infectiousness and linking them into a system of quarantine, testing, and health care worker case management. The international experience of digital contact tracing apps during the COVID-19 pandemic demonstrates how challenging their design and deployment are. Objective This study aims to derive and summarize best practice guidance for the design of the ideal digital contact tracing app. Methods A collaborative cross-disciplinary approach was used to derive best practice guidance for designing the ideal digital contact tracing app. A search of the indexed and gray literature was conducted to identify articles describing or evaluating digital contact tracing apps. MEDLINE was searched using a combination of free-text terms and Medical Subject Headings search terms. Gray literature sources searched were the World Health Organization Institutional Repository for Information Sharing, the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control publications library, and Google, including the websites of many health protection authorities. Articles that were acceptable for inclusion in this evidence synthesis were peer-reviewed publications, cohort studies, randomized trials, modeling studies, technical reports, white papers, and media reports related to digital contact tracing. Results Ethical, user experience, privacy and data protection, technical, clinical and societal, and evaluation considerations were identified from the literature. The ideal digital contact tracing app should be voluntary and should be equitably available and accessible. User engagement could be enhanced by small financial incentives, enabling users to tailor aspects of the app to their particular needs and integrating digital contact tracing apps into the wider public health information campaign. Adherence to the principles of good data protection and privacy by design is important to convince target populations to download and use digital contact tracing apps. Bluetooth Low Energy is recommended for a digital contact tracing app's contact event detection, but combining it with ultrasound technology may improve a digital contact tracing app's accuracy. A decentralized privacy-preserving protocol should be followed to enable digital contact tracing app users to exchange and record temporary contact numbers during contact events. The ideal digital contact tracing app should define and risk-stratify contact events according to proximity, duration of contact, and the infectiousness of the case at the time of contact. Evaluating digital contact tracing apps requires data to quantify app downloads, use among COVID-19 cases, successful contact alert generation, contact alert receivers, contact alert receivers that adhere to quarantine and testing recommendations, and the number of contact alert receivers who subsequently are tested positive for COVID-19. The outcomes of digital contact tracing apps' evaluations should be openly reported to allow for the wider public to review the evaluation of the app. Conclusions In conclusion, key considerations and best practice guidance for the design of the ideal digital contact tracing app were derived from the literature.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

Subject

Health Informatics

Reference199 articles.

1. Timeline: WHO's COVID-19 responseWorld Health Organization2020-09-26https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/interactive-timeline

2. WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) DashboardWorld Health Organization2021-05-28https://covid19.who.int/

3. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19)World Health Organization2020-09-26https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/question-and-answers-hub/q-a-detail/q-a-coronaviruses

4. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): situation report, 46World Health Organization20202021-03-17https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/331443

5. Critical preparedness, readiness and response actions for COVID-19: interim guidanceWorld Health Organization202006242020-09-26https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/332665

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3