Outcomes of Digital Biomarker–Based Interventions: Protocol for a Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews

Author:

Motahari-Nezhad HosseinORCID,Péntek MártaORCID,Gulácsi LászlóORCID,Zrubka ZsomborORCID

Abstract

Background Digital biomarkers are defined as objective, quantifiable, physiological, and behavioral data that are collected and measured using digital devices such as portables, wearables, implantables, or digestibles. For their widespread adoption in publicly financed health care systems, it is important to understand how their benefits translate into improved patient outcomes, which is essential for demonstrating their value. Objective The paper presents the protocol for a systematic review that aims to assess the quality and strength of the evidence reported in systematic reviews regarding the impact of digital biomarkers on clinical outcomes compared to interventions without digital biomarkers. Methods A comprehensive search for reviews from 2019 to 2020 will be conducted in PubMed and the Cochrane Library using keywords related to digital biomarkers and a filter for systematic reviews. Original full-text English publications of systematic reviews comparing clinical outcomes of interventions with and without digital biomarkers via meta-analysis will be included. The AMSTAR-2 tool will be used to assess the methodological quality of these reviews. To assess the quality of evidence, we will evaluate the systematic reviews using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) tool. To detect the possible presence of reporting bias, we will determine whether a protocol was published prior to the start of the studies. A qualitative summary of the results by digital biomarker technology and outcomes will be provided. Results This protocol was submitted before data collection. Search, screening, and data extraction will commence in December 2021 in accordance with the published protocol. Conclusions Our study will provide a comprehensive summary of the highest level of evidence available on digital biomarker interventions, providing practical guidance for health care providers. Our results will help identify clinical areas in which the use of digital biomarkers has led to favorable clinical outcomes. In addition, our findings will highlight areas of evidence gaps where the clinical benefits of digital biomarkers have not yet been demonstrated. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) PRR1-10.2196/28204

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

Subject

General Medicine

Reference59 articles.

1. Biomarker definitions and their applications

2. Traditional and Digital Biomarkers: Two Worlds Apart?

3. Developing and adopting safe and effective digital biomarkers to improve patient outcomes

4. Digital health and digital biomarkers – enabling value chains on health data

5. Global Digital Biomarkers Market: Focus on Key Trends, Growth Potential, Competitive Landscape, Components (Data Collection and Integration), End Users, Application (Sleep and Movement, Neuro, Respiratory and Cardiological Disorders) and Region – Analysis and Forecast, 2019-2025BIS Research20202021-12-27https://bisresearch.com/industry-report/digital-biomarkers-market.html

Cited by 11 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3