Author:
JAMES REBECCA,THOMAS JOMY P,M CHITTADI SRUTHI
Abstract
Objectives: The objectives of the study were (1) to compare the effectiveness of problem-based learning (PBL) in classroom and problem-based mobile learning (PBML) using a mobile application and (2) to study the perception of students to PBML and PBL in classroom.
Methods: After getting clearance from institutional ethics committee, an interventional study was conducted for a period of 2 months among 250 Phase IMBBS students of Government Medical College Kozhikode, Kerala. Students who gave consent for the study were divided into two groups, namely, R-1 and R-2, and analyzed for the effectiveness of PBML as a teaching learning method in comparison with PBL in classroom. Perception of students toward use of PBML and PBL as teaching learning method was collected using validated questionnaire.
Results: It was observed from the study that in all the sessions post-test mean scores were significantly higher than pre-test scores in both PBL and PBML. Before the intervention there was no significant difference in the pre-test mean scores in topics done by PBL and PBML. After intervention the only the post-test mean scores significantly improved. When the total post score scores of PBL and PBML compared, it was found that PBML mean score is significantly higher than PBL mean score. In the student’s perception analysis, it was found that both methods are effective in concept building, stimulating, helpful in passing exams, and development of problem-learning skills.
Conclusion: From the study finding, we can conclude that both PBL and PBML are effective modes of teaching applied biochemistry for Phase I MBBS students. PBML is more effective than PBL in teaching applied biochemistry in Phase I MBBS students. Perception analysis shows that interaction with the students and doubt clearance is more effectuated with PBL than PBML.
Publisher
Innovare Academic Sciences Pvt Ltd
Subject
Pharmacology (medical),Pharmaceutical Science,Pharmacology
Reference10 articles.
1. Golenhofen N, Heindl F, Grab-Kroll C, Messerer DA, Bockers TM, AnjaBockers A. ???. Anat Sci Educ 2019;13:263-4.
2. Darras KE, Van Merrienboer JJ, Toom M, Roberson ND, De Bruin AB, Nicolaou S, et al. Developing the evidence base for M-learning in undergraguate radiology education: Identifying learner preference for mobile apps. J Med Syst 2018;42:194.
3. Chase TJ, Julius A, Chandan JS, Powell E, Hall CS, Phillips BL, et al. Mobile learning in medicine: An evaluation of attitudes and behaviours of medical students. BMC Med Educ 2018;18:152. doi: 10.1186/ s12909-018-1264-5.
4. Mughal NA, Atkins ER, Morrow DL, Al-Jundi W. Smartphone learning as an adjunct to vascular teaching a pilot project. BMC Med Educ 2018;18:37. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1148-8, PMID 29544474.
5. Khan AA, Siddiqui AZ, Mohsin SF, Momani MM, Mirza EH. Impact of network aided platforms as educational tools on academic performance and attitude of pharmacology students. Pak J Med Sci 2017;33:1473-8. doi: 10.12669/pjms.336.13290, PMID 29492081.