Affiliation:
1. BİNGÖL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, GENÇ MESLEK YÜKSEKOKULU
2. KASTAMONU ÜNİVERSİTESİ, ORMAN FAKÜLTESİ
3. HARRAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ, MÜHENDİSLİK FAKÜLTESİ
Abstract
In recent years, the usage of lignocellulosic biomasses in food supplements has become popular. The studies about the development of reliable and short-term methods in the extraction of these active components in lignocellulosic biomasses and the usage of eco-friendly solvents have increased gradually. Traditional extraction methods take a long time and use a large amounts of organic solvents. In addition, the damages of used organic solvents to the environment are high considerably. For this reason, the need for technologies that reduce the extraction time and reduce the use of organic solvents and environmentally friendly "green chemistry" solvents is increasing day by day. In this review, traditional and modern extraction methods were examined and general application areas of these methods were introduced. Traditional extraction methods include maceration, pressing, infusion, digestion, percolation, decoction, reflux, tincture, distillation, and soxhlet methods, and modern extraction methods including pressurized liquid extraction, supercritical fluid extraction, ultrasonic assisted extraction, microwave assisted extraction, pulsed electric field extraction, enzyme assisted extraction methods, and their variation parameters were investigated. It has been seen that modern extraction methods are performed in less amount of sample, lower volume of solvent, lower energy consumption, and shorter extraction times compared to traditional methods. Within the scope of the study, considering all these, it has been determined that modern extraction methods are more applicable to nature-friendly methods than traditional methods.
Traditional extraction methods including maceration, pressing, infusion, digestion, percolation, decoction, reflux, tincture, distillation, and soxhlet methods and modern extraction methods including pressurized liquid extraction, supercritical fluid extraction, ultrasonic assisted extraction, microwave assisted extraction, pulsed electric field extraction, enzyme assisted extraction methods and their variation parameters were investigated. It has been seen that modern extraction methods are performed in less amount of sample, lower volume of solvent, lower energy consumption and shorter extraction times compared to traditional methods. Within the scope of the study, considering all these, it has been determined that modern extraction methods are more applicable nature-friendly methods than traditional methods.
Publisher
Bartin Orman Fakultesi Dergisi
Reference101 articles.
1. Abegunde, S. M., Ayodele-Oduola, R. O. (2015). Comparison of Efficiency of Different Solvents Used for the Extraction of Phytochemicals from the Leaf, Seed and Stem Bark of Calotropis Procera. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 4(7), 835-838.
2. Abd Aziz, N. A., Hasham, R., Sarmidi, M. R., Suhaimi, S. H., Idris, M. K. H. (2021). A review on extraction techniques and therapeutic value of polar bioactives from Asian medicinal herbs: Case study on Orthosiphon aristatus, Eurycoma longifolia and Andrographis paniculata. Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal, 29, 143-165.
3. Abubakar, A. R., Haque, M. (2020). Preparation of Medicinal Plants: Basic Extraction and Fractionation Procedures for Experimental Purposes. Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences, 12, 1-10.
4. Agregan, R., Munekata, P. E. S., Feng, X., Astray, G., Gullon, B., Lorenzo, J. M. (2021). Recent advances in the Extraction of Polyphenols from eggplant and their application in foods. LWT – Food Science and Technology, 146, 111381.
5. Ağçam, E., Akyıldız, A., Akdemir Evrendilek, G. (2014). Vurgulu Elektrik Alan Teknolojisi (PEF): Sistem ve Uygulama Odacıkları. Academic Food Journal, 12(2), 69-78.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献