Patients' Use and Perception of Medication Information Leaflets

Author:

Nathan Joseph P1,Zerilli Tina2,Cicero Lorraine A3,Rosenberg Jack M3

Affiliation:

1. Division of Pharmacy Practice, Arnold & Marie Schwartz College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Long Island University, Brooklyn, NY

2. International Drug Information Center; Adjunct Assistant Professor, Division of Pharmacy Practice, Arnold & Marie Schwartz College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Long Island University

3. Division of Pharmacy Practice, Arnold & Marie Schwartz College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Long Island University

Abstract

Background: Federal law mandates that at least 95% of patients receive useful written information with new medications. Recent data concerning whether patients read such leaflets are lacking. Objectives: To evaluate whether patients read non–manufacturer-developed leaflets and assess patients' opinions concerning the understandability and usefulness of these leaflets. Methods: Patients were surveyed at 32 community pharmacies in the New York City metropolitan area. The main outcome measures were the percentage of patients who read the leaflet provided with new and refilled medications and the perceived understandability and usefulness of the leaflet. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the results. Results: A total of 307 patients were surveyed. For leaflets provided with new medications, 151 (49.2%), 65 (21.2%), 49 (16.0%), and 42 (13.7%) reported reading the leaflets always, often, seldom, or never, respectively. For refilled medications, 64 (21.6%), 41 (13.9%), 78 (26.4%), and 113 (38.2%) of the 296 respondents reported reading the leaflets always, often, seldom, or never, respectively. Of 267 patients who read the leaflets provided with new or refilled prescriptions at least seldom, 258 (96.6%) responded to the question concerning its understandability and 257 (96.3%) responded to the question concerning its usefulness. One hundred forty-five (56.2%), 89 (34.5%), 22 (8.5%), and 2 (0.8%) reported that the leaflet was very easy, somewhat easy, somewhat difficult, and very difficult to understand, respectively, and 164 (63.8%), 90 (35.0%), and 3 (1.2%) reported that the leaflet was very useful, somewhat useful, and not useful, respectively. Conclusions: Approximately two-thirds of the patients surveyed reported reading the leaflets provided with new medications at least often. The majority reported the leaflets to be useful and easy to understand. Pharmacists should advocate reading the leaflet and promote it as a useful resource. The leaflet should not replace the pharmacist's obligation to provide verbal counseling.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Pharmacology (medical)

Cited by 50 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Bioavailability of dronedarone tablets administered with or without food in healthy participants;American Heart Journal Plus: Cardiology Research and Practice;2024-09

2. Perception and Use of Consumer Medicine Information (CMI) Leaflets by Egyptian Drug Consumers;Journal of Hospital Librarianship;2024-06-10

3. A survey on perceived medication guide reading and comprehension ease among US adults;Health Promotion International;2024-02-01

4. Medication literacy and its social contextuality;Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine;2023-12-05

5. Evaluation of gastroprotectant administration in hospitalized cats in a tertiary referral hospital;Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery;2023-10

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3