A survey on perceived medication guide reading and comprehension ease among US adults

Author:

Jones Paul R1ORCID,Santiago Jonas1,Pearsall Bryon M1,Chu Dan-My1,Wolff Carolyn2,Kearsley Aaron2

Affiliation:

1. Division of Medical Policy Programs, Office of Medical Policy Initiatives, Office of Medical Policy, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) , 10903 New Hampshire Avenue, Silver Spring, MD 20993 , USA

2. Office of Economics and Analysis, Office of Policy, Legislation, and International Affairs, Office of the Commissioner, FDA , 10903 New Hampshire Avenue, Silver Spring, MD 20993 , USA

Abstract

Abstract Medication guides (MGs) provide patients with important information about certain prescription drugs to help them take these drugs safely. We surveyed US residents about their perceptions of MG readability and understandability. We randomly sampled 5204 US residents (age 18+) from Ipsos’s KnowledgePanel to complete a two-part survey. Only respondents who reported receiving an MG with their prescription drugs (n = 3852) completed part 2, which included two key items: How easy to [(1)read/(2)understand] are the MGs that you have received from a pharmacy along with your prescription medicines? (1 = Very easy, 5 = Very difficult; reverse-coded). Health literacy (HL) and demographic data were also collected. After weighting our data, we found that 85% of respondents who reported receiving an MG perceived this information as ‘very easy’ (27.3%), ‘somewhat easy’ (28.3%) or ‘about average’ (29.3%) to read. Eighty-seven percent of respondents who reported receiving an MG perceived it as ‘very easy’ (27.6%), ‘somewhat easy’ (30.2%) or ‘about average’ (29.5%) to understand. ANOVAs revealed higher average perceived MG reading and comprehension ease scores among respondents presumed to have adequate versus inadequate HL (ps ≤ 0.0006). Younger or less-educated respondents and non-Hispanic Blacks perceived MGs as easier to read and understand, on average, than their counterparts (ps ≤ 0.0001). Many of these relationships remained intact in models predicting perceived MG reading and comprehension ease (ps ≤ 0.001). Adjusted R2 values across models were small, however (≤0.06). Our findings suggest most US residents (18+) who received MGs perceived them to be ‘about average’ to ‘very easy’ to read and understand.

Funder

Food and Drug Administration

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference57 articles.

1. Health literacy: Report of the council on scientific affairs;Ad Hoc Committee on Health Literacy for the Council on Scientific Affairs, American Medical Association (AHCHLCSA-AMA);JAMA,1999

2. Assessing readability of patient education materials: current role in orthopaedics;Badarudeen;Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research,2010

3. Development of a brief test to measure functional health literacy;Baker;Patient Education and Counseling,1999

4. A self-presentational view of social phenomena;Baumeister;Psychological Bulletin,1982

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3