FROM THE REVISION OF THE ECONOMIC THEORY TO THE REVISION OF THE ECONOMIC POLICY: THE TRAPS OF THE NEW MACROECONOMIC CONSENSUS

Author:

REZNIKOVA NATALIIAORCID, ,PANCHENKO VolodymyrORCID,IVASHCHENKO OksanaORCID,

Abstract

Following on from categories of theoretical and empirical levels of learning, the revision of the modern economic policy instruments is made for the purpose of their compliance with the directions of the (macro)economic theories, determination of the objectives of its actualization, and also revealing its stabilizing and allocative functions in the process of its acquisition of the international economic policy attributes. It’s established that economic theory, which is per se a dynamic, open, and unstable system of the economic knowledge that is based on corresponding assumptions and presumes simplified modeling of the economic processes because of the limitations of the offered methods, demonstrates low explicative ability in the course of analysis requested when choosing one or another economic policy according to the challenges of times. It’s proved that although different economic theories can be an effective tool in the rivalry for unfair intellectual arguments in favor of one or another political decision in particular cases, the economic policy typically doesn’t look like a way of mechanistic implementation of theoretical generalization. Although the rivalry with the help of the analytical arguments between the followers of the fiscal and monetary instruments of the macroeconomic policy allowed to get the intermediate result within the New macroeconomic consensus (NMC) with regard to recognition of the monetary policy precedence in the realization of the low rate of the price advance, the experience of the global financial crisis in 2008 – 2010 and global recession in 2020 threw into question the ability of the stabilization programs developed on the basis of NMC recommendations to achieve the expected results. The experience of the last decade marked with combination of the instability of both cyclical and structural and systemic nature, formed the demand for recognition of the fiscal policy as the stabilization programs’ component of the full value. In a bid for interpretation of the ways and aftermaths of the realization of the international economic policy the demand is made for the forming of the new scientific consensual evaluations and theoretical generalizations.

Publisher

National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (Co. LTD Ukrinformnauka)

Reference31 articles.

1. 1. El-Erian M. A New Normal. Secular Outlook. PIMCO, available at: http://media.pimco.com/Documents/Secular%20Outlook%20May_09%20Email-Web%20FINAL3.pdf

2. 2. El-Erian M. Navigating the New Normal in Industrial Countries. Washington, Per Jacobsson Foundation, 2010, 37 p.

3. 3. El-Erian М. PERSPECTIVES: The New Normal 2.0. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 2020, Vol. 64 (7), pp. 5-7, available at: https://jpm.pm-research.com/content/early/2020/05/23/jpm.2020.1.164 (accessed on: 29.12.2020).

4. 4. Mack O., Khare A., Kramer A., Burgartz Th. Managing in a VUCA world. Berlin, Springer, 2016, 259 p.

5. 5. Panchenko V., Reznikova N. New norm of the global economy as an environment for transformation of protectionism into neo-protectionism. International Relations. Series: Economic Science, 2014, No. 4, available at: http://journals.iir.kiev.ua/index.php/ec_n/article/view/3144 [in Ukrainian] (accessed on: 27.12.2020).

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3