Abstract
This article attempts to provide a comprehensive overview of the academic literature on the subject, examining the different approaches, their similarities and general differences, advantages and disadvantages, and providing a consolidated and critical perspective that will hopefully be useful for future research in the field. The paper presents the results of a systematic review of Western academic studies on the existence of echo chambers in social media, an initial classification of the literature and the identification of research patterns. The authors show how conceptual and methodological choices influence research findings on the topic. Future research should take into account the potential shortcomings of different approaches and the significant potential of linking data.
Publisher
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
Reference80 articles.
1. Allcott, H., Braghieri, L., Eichmeyer, S., & Gentzkow, M. (2020). The welfare effects of social media. American Economic Review, 110(3): 629-76. Retrieved June, 7, 2022, from https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257%2Faer.20190658&utm_campaign=Johannes.
2. Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 211-236. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.2.211
3. Arendt, H. (1972). Crises of the Republic: Lying in Politics; Civil Disobedience; On Violence; Thoughts on Politics and Revolution. Harcourt, Brace & Co.
4. Bakshy, E., Messing, S., & Adamic, L.A. (2015). Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook6. Science, 348(6239), 1130-1132.
5. Barberá, P. (2015). How social media reduces mass political polarization. Evidence from Germany, Spain, and the U.S. Paper presented at the 2015 APSA conference. Retrieved June, 7, 2022, from: http://pablobarbera.com/static/barbera_polarization_APSA.pdf.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献