Philosophy, Governance and Law in the System of Social Action: Moral and Instrumental Problems of Genetic Research

Author:

Przhilenskiy Vladimir I.ORCID

Abstract

The research analyzes the process of formation of the ethics committee as a new institution in the system of regulation of genetic research. The external factors of this process are the increasing digitalization of medical and research practices, as well as the special situation that is developing in the field of genomic research and the use of genetic technologies, where issues of philosophy, jurisprudence and administration have generated many fundamentally new, and sometimes unexpected contexts. The author shows the similarity and difference of approaches to the inclusion of the ethics committee in the national regulatory systems of different countries and determines the prospects for further integration of the new institution into normative and administrative-regulatory and law enforcement practices. The research applies all the main methods of system analysis and structural and functional analysis, as well as the comparative legal method. At the stage of generalization of empirical material, the author turns to the means and methods of philosophical phenomenology and phenomenological sociology. The study revealed that the ethics committee may have different institutional and regulatory functions in a variety of management and legal systems. Being hybrid in nature, the ethics committee performs various functions, and in various state legal systems and traditions it can combine elements of legislative, executive and judicial power. At times, the ethics committee may go beyond the scope of both a purely administrative and exclusively legal regulator. All this indicates that the integration of this institution into the legal system and into a variety of social practices is far from being completed.

Publisher

Peoples' Friendship University of Russia

Reference12 articles.

1. Grebenshchikova EG, Tischenko PD. Digitized future of medicine: challenges for bioethics. Philosophical Sciences. 2020;(2):83—103. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2020-63-2-83-103

2. Lectorsky VA, Pruzhinin BI, Alexeeva IY, Arshinov VI, Gorokhov VG, Dubrovsky DI, Kiyashchenko LP, Tischenko PD. Convergence of biological, information, nano- and cognitive technologies: challenges of philosophy (material of the round table). Voprosy philosophii. 2012;(12):3—23. (In Russian).

3. Dyson F. “Our Biotech Future”. The New York Review of Books 54. 2007;(12):4—8.

4. Nowotny H, Testa G. Naked genes: rethinking the human in the molecular age. L.: MIT Press; 2010.

5. Przhilenskiy VI. Legal and ethical expertise in the sphere of genetic research: problems of regulation and institutionalization. Medical Ethics. 2022;10(2):13—16. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.24075/medet.2022.043

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3