Legal and ethical expertise of genetic research: issues of regulation and institutionalization

Author:

Przhilenskiy VI1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL), Moscow, Russia

Abstract

Although legal regulation of genetic research has been steadily improved, it is still lagging behind promotion of genetic research, especially in the field of development and use of its achievement-based technologies. A distinct feature of this legal area is currently a higher dependence on ethics. This resulted in establishment of a special institution, an ethics committee, that unites the possibilities of ethical and legal expertise giving birth to numerous organizational and substantive issues. Some of them are reflected in discussions about the relationship between moral reflection and legislative processes, epidemiological status of bioethics, etc. For instance, in Russian literature there is a thesis that organization and conduction of ethical expertise is regulated much better than those of legal one and can be implemented within the current legal and regulatory framework. Meanwhile, a need for legal expertise in genomic research and genetic technologies is not inferior but even superior. This is confirmed by deficient legal support of many important decisions taken by the authorities and actions accomplished by research groups. The article reviews opinions of Russian and foreign scientists who provide different assessment of the role of ethics committees and their possible falling within law or ethics. The role and place of ethics committees in the system of rule-making harmonization and law enforcement are specified.

Publisher

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Reference13 articles.

1. Sedova NN. Zavisimost’ nezavisimyh jeticheskih komitetov. Biojetika. 2008; (2): 16–19. Russian.

2. Kuznecova JuA, Smirnova AV, Zhuravleva MV. Jepidemija i jetika: rabota moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo nezavisimogo jeticheskogo komiteta v period bor’by s COVID-19. Problemy standartizacii v zdravoohranenii. 2020; (9–10): 9–15. Russian.

3. Mohov AA. Biojetika — netradicionnyj istochnik medicinskogo prava. Medicinskoe pravo. 2007; (2): 44. Russian.

4. Gussejnov AA. Razmyshlenija o prikladnoj jetike V knige: Bakshtanovskij VI i Karnauhov NN, redaktory Vedomosti Nauchno-issledovatel’skogo Instituta prikladnoj jetiki. Vyp. 25: Professional’naja jetika Tjumen’: NIIPJe, 2004; 148–159 s. Russian.

5. Mohov AA. Medicinskoj nauke i praktike — instituty i procedury ocenki (jekspertizy) geneticheskih tehnologij. Obrazovanie i pravo. 2019; (10): 231–232. Russian.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3