A customização da Extensão Rural e suas implicações para o ensino-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

A customização da Extensão Rural e suas implicações para o ensino

Published:2022 Issue: Volume: Page:1-50
ISSN:2525-4863
Container-title:Revista Brasileira de Educação do Campo
language:
Short-container-title:Rev. Bras. Educ. Camp.

Author:

Diesel Vivien¹^ORCID,Dias Marcelo Mina²^ORCID,Neumann Pedro Selvino¹^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Universidade Federal de Santa Maria - UFSM

2. Universidade Federal de Viçosa - UFV

Abstract

This study examined the reconfigurations in the field of extension work and its potential influences in the academic discipline of rural extension. It recognizes that one of the ongoing changes has an institutional nature and is related to the adoption of a pluralist model of rural extension. It is argued that the adoption of a pluralist model leads to the recognition of a greater diversity of types of organizations active in the rural extension system, which favors the occurrence of processes of customization of normative references that are used to guide the extension field work. A comprehensive literature review was performed to characterize these dynamics in the global and Brazilian scope, exploring their implications for the rural extension teaching. The results suggest that this movement implies a scenario of professional profile disputes that reflects, ultimately, disputes over projects for rural development, which must be made explicit within the scope of teaching, highlighting their relationships with the normative references for action professional.

Publisher

Universidade Federal do Tocantins

Subject

Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Polymers and Plastics,Business and International Management

Reference90 articles.

1. Alex, G., Byerlee, D., Helene-Collion, M., & Rivera, W. (2004). Extension and rural development: converging views on institutional approaches? Washington: World Bank.

2. Alves, E. R. A., Santana, C. A. M., & Contini, E. (2016). Extensão rural: seu problema não é a comunicação. In Vieira Filho, J. E. R., & Gasques, J. G. (Orgs.). Agricultura, transformação produtiva e sustentabilidade (pp. 65-86). Brasília: IPEA.

3. Anderson, C. R., Binimelis, R., Pimbert, M. P., & Rivera-Ferre, M. G. (2019). Introduction to the symposium on critical adult education in food movements: learning for transformation in and beyond food movements – the why, where, how and the what next? Agriculture and Human Values, 36(3), 521-529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-019-09941-2

4. Arroyo, M. G. (2007). Políticas de formação de educadores do campo. Cad. Cedes, 27(72), 157-176. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-32622007000200004

5. Bergamasco, S., & Borsatto, R. (2016). Evaluation of Extension Reforms in Brazil (Final Report presented to IFPRI). Campinas: Unicamp.