Affiliation:
1. Universidad Rafael Urdaneta
2. Texas Tech University
3. Universidad Austral de Chile
4. University of Manitoba
5. Universidad Experimental de los Llanos Ezequiel Zamora
6. Moyamix
Abstract
Benefitingfrominterventionsof thesavannaecosystem, breedersinLosLlanosof ApureState(Venezuela) are exploring the opportunity to improve cattle genetics by implementing crossbreeding programs.Fifty bulls (23 months of age) of five types of Brahman influence [Brahman (n =10), F1 Angus x Brahman (F1Angus; n = 10), F1 Chianina x Brahman (F1Chianina; n = 10), F1 Romosinuano x Brahman (F1Romosinuano; n =10), and F1 Simmental x Brahman (F1Simmental; n = 10)] were selected to be compared in carcass performance(linear measurements, quality and quantity indicators, Venezuelan and U.S. grades, and cutability) at a desirableconformation endpoint with a suitable market weight of 480 kg. An ANOVAcovariance was performed using thegeneralized linear model and frequency distribution of Venezuelan and U.S. grades by breed type were comparedusing theχ2test (P < 0.05). Shorter Brahman carcasses exhibited the most abundant finish, significantly differentfromthe longer F1Simmental and F1Romosinuano counterparts. All carcasses fell into the Ayoungest maturityand were eligible for the USDA"Bullock" class designation; 62%reached the top Venezuelan quality grade, 96%graded U.S. Standard and 64%reached the U.S. yield grade 1, indicating superior cutability. Significant differences(P<0.05)in yieldof individual cuts (ribeye +striploin, andcuts fromthe round) were detectedbetween F1Romosinuano and Brahman, F1Angus, and F1Chianina counterparts. F1Chianina bulls had slight but significant(P<0.05) advantages inyieldof highvaluedboneless cuts as comparedtothose of F1RomosinuanoandF1Simmental counterparts. Conversely, F1RomosinuanooutperformedF1Chianina in1.73 %of mediumvaluedboneless cuts (P<0.05).Under the sample selectioncriteria andharvest endpoint, slight changes incarcassperformance can be expected fromcrossbreeding.
Publisher
Asociación Latinoamericana de Producción Animal (ALPA)
Reference38 articles.
1. Byers, F. M., H. R. Cross, and G. T. Schelling. 1988. Integrated nutrition, genetics, and growth management programs for lean beef production. In: Designing Foods: Animal product options in the marketplace. National Academy Press, Washington, DC. p. 283–291. https://doi.org/10.17226/1036
2. Chase Jr., C.C., P. J. Chenoweth, R.E. Larsen, A. C. Hammond, T. A. Olson, R.L. West, and D.D. Johnson. 2001. Growth, puberty, and carcass characteristics of Brahman-, Senepol-, and Tuli-sired F1 Angus bulls. J. of Anim. Sci. 89: 2006–2015. https://doi.org/10.2527/2001.7982006x
3. COVENIN. 1982. Comisión Venezolana de Normas Industriales. Norma Venezolana 792-82. Carne de bovino. Definición e identificación de las piezas de una canal. Ministerio de Fomento. Fondonorma, Caracas, Venezuela. p 10.
4. COVENIN. 1983. Comisión Venezolana de Normas Industriales. Norma Venezolana 2072-83. Ganado bovino. Inspección Postmortem. Ministerio de Fomento. Fondonorma, Caracas, Venezuela. p 10.
5. Crouse, J. D., L. V. Cundiff, R. M. Koch, M. Koohmaraie, and S.C. Seideman. 1989. Comparisons of Bos indicus and Bos taurus inheritance for carcass beef characteristics and meat palatability. J. Anim. Sci. 67: 2661-2668. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1989.67102661x
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献