The Parenting to Reduce Adolescent Depression and Anxiety Scale: Assessing parental concordance with parenting guidelines for the prevention of adolescent depression and anxiety disorders

Author:

Cardamone-Breen Mairead C.1,Jorm Anthony F.2,Lawrence Katherine A.1,Mackinnon Andrew J.23,Yap Marie B.H.12

Affiliation:

1. School of Psychological Sciences, Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

2. Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

3. Black Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Abstract

BackgroundDespite substantial evidence demonstrating numerous parental risk and protective factors for the development of adolescent depression and anxiety disorders, there is currently no single measure that assesses these parenting factors. To address this gap, we developed theParenting to Reduce Adolescent Depression and Anxiety Scale (PRADAS)as a criterion-referenced measure of parental concordance with a set of evidence-based parenting guidelines for the prevention of adolescent depression and anxiety disorders. In this paper, we used a sample of Australian parents of adolescents to: (1) validate the PRADAS as a criterion-referenced measure; (2) examine parental concordance with the guidelines in the sample; and (3) examine correlates of parental concordance with the guidelines.MethodsSeven hundred eleven parents completed the PRADAS, as well as two established parenting measures, and parent-report measures of adolescent depression and anxiety symptoms. Six hundred sixty adolescent participants (aged 12–15) also completed the symptom measures. Concordance with the guidelines was assessed via nine subscale scores and a total score. Reliability of the scores was assessed with an estimate of the agreement coefficient, as well as 1-month test-retest reliability. Convergent validity was examined via correlations between the scale and two established parenting measures.ResultsOne proposed subscale was removed from the final version of the scale, resulting in a total of eight subscales. Reliability was high for the total score, and acceptable to high for seven of the eight subscales. One-month test-retest reliability was acceptable to high for the total score. Convergent validity was supported by moderate to high correlations with two established measures of parenting. Overall, rates of parental concordance with the guidelines were low in our sample. Higher scores were associated with being female and higher levels of parental education. Greater parental concordance with the guidelines was associated with fewer symptoms of depression and anxiety in adolescent participants.DiscussionThis initial validation study provides preliminary support for the reliability and validity of the PRADAS. The scale has potential for use in both clinical and research settings. It may be used to identify parents’ strengths and potential targets for intervention, and as an outcome measure in studies of preventive parenting interventions.

Funder

Monash University Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences Faculty Strategic Grant Scheme

Australian Rotary Health Research Grant

Windermere Foundation Doctoral Scholarship in Health (Allied Health, 2016)

Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship

National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Career Development Fellowship

NHMRC Senior Principal Research Fellowship

Publisher

PeerJ

Subject

General Agricultural and Biological Sciences,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Medicine,General Neuroscience

Reference68 articles.

1. The theory of planned behavior;Ajzen;Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,1991

2. Development of a short questionnaire for use in epidemiological studies of depression in children and adolescents;Angold;International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research,1995

3. Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: a meta-analytic review;Armitage;British Journal of Social Psychology,2001

4. The inventory of parent and peer attachment: individual differences and their relationship to psychological well-being in adolescence;Armsden;Journal of Youth and Adolescence,1987

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3