Of power and despair in cetacean conservation: estimation and detection of trend in abundance with noisy and short time-series

Author:

Authier Matthieu12ORCID,Galatius Anders3ORCID,Gilles Anita4ORCID,Spitz Jérôme15ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Observatoire Pelagis UMS3462 CNRS-La Rochelle Université, La Rochelle Université, La Rochelle, France

2. ADERA, Bordeaux, France

3. Department of Bioscience - Marine Mammal Research, Åarhus University, Roskilde, Denmark

4. Institute for Terrestrial and Aquatic Wildlife Research (ITAW), University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Büsum, Germany

5. Centre d’Etudes Biologiques de Chizé UMR 7372 CNRS - La Rochelle Université, CNRS, Villiers en Bois, France

Abstract

Many conservation instruments rely on detecting and estimating a population decline in a target species to take action. Trend estimation is difficult because of small sample size and relatively large uncertainty in abundance/density estimates of many wild populations of animals. Focusing on cetaceans, we performed a prospective analysis to estimate power, type-I, sign (type-S) and magnitude (type-M) error rates of detecting a decline in short time-series of abundance estimates with different signal-to-noise ratio. We contrasted results from both unregularized (classical) and regularized approaches. The latter allows to incorporate prior information when estimating a trend. Power to detect a statistically significant estimates was in general lower than 80%, except for large declines. The unregularized approach (status quo) had inflated type-I error rates and gave biased (either over- or under-) estimates of a trend. The regularized approach with a weakly-informative prior offered the best trade-off in terms of bias, statistical power, type-I, type-S and type-M error rates and confidence interval coverage. To facilitate timely conservation decisions, we recommend to use the regularized approach with a weakly-informative prior in the detection and estimation of trend with short and noisy time-series of abundance estimates.

Publisher

PeerJ

Subject

General Agricultural and Biological Sciences,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Medicine,General Neuroscience

Reference92 articles.

1. Approximate is better than “Exact” for interval estimation of binomial proportions;Agresti;American Statistician,1998

2. Retire statistical significance;Amrhein;Nature,2019

3. A comparison of tests for detecting trend in abundance indices of dolphins;Anganuzzi;Fishery Bulletin U.S.,1993

4. Conservation science for marine megafauna in Europe: historical perspectives and future directions;Authier;Deep Sea Research Part II,2017

5. Change in relative abundance of marine megafauna in the bay of biscay 2004–2014: an exploratory analysis;Authier;Progress in Oceanography,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3