Reliability of gait speed measured by a timed walking test in patients one year after stroke

Author:

Green John1,Forster Anne,Young John2

Affiliation:

1. Bradford Community NHS Trust, Bradford, West Yorkshire, UK

2. Department of Health Care for the Elderly, Bradford Hospitals NHS Trust, Bradford, West Yorkshire, UK

Abstract

Objective: To assess the reliability of gait speed in late-stage stroke patients. Design: Test–retest reliability of three timed walks to 10 metres repeated during two assessments one week apart. Setting: The patient's home. Subjects: Twenty-two stroke patients with mobility problems more than one year after stroke. Main outcome measure: Gait speed measured in seconds taken to walk 10 metres. Statistical analysis: Intraclass correlations (ICCs) with 95% con”dence interval (CI) and the Bland and Altman method for assessing agreement by calculating the mean difference between measurements ( d–); the 95% CI for d–; the standard deviation of the difference (SDdiff); a reliability coef”cient and the 95% limits of agreement. Results: There was a trend for decreased times taken to walk 10 metres both within each assessment and between assessments. ICCs for within assessment reliability were 0.95–0.99. The d– (SDdiff) for the second and third walks for assessment 1 was –1.00 (2.63) seconds and for assessment 2 was –0.70 (1.58) seconds. The reliability coef”cient was 5.26 for assessment 1 and 3.17 for assessment 2. ICCs for between-assessment reliability were 0.87–0.88. The d – (SDdiff) for the comparison of the third walks at assessment 1 and assessment 2 was –0.90 (5.01) seconds. The reliability coef”cient was 10.02 and the 95% limits of agreement were –10.92 to +9.12 seconds. Conclusion: Within-assessment gait speed measured at home is highly reliable. The between-assessment reliability of gait speed measurement is less reliable but comparable with other studies.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Rehabilitation,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3