A SPATIOTEMPORAL-AWARE WEIGHTING SCHEME FOR IMPROVING CLIMATE MODEL ENSEMBLE PREDICTIONS
-
Published:2022
Issue:4
Volume:3
Page:29-55
-
ISSN:2689-3967
-
Container-title:Journal of Machine Learning for Modeling and Computing
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:J Mach Learn Model Comput
Author:
Fan Ming,Lu Dan,Rastogi Deeksha,Pierce Eric M.
Abstract
Multimodel ensembling has been widely used to improve climate model predictions, and the improvement strongly depends on the ensembling scheme. In this work, we propose a Bayesian neural network (BNN) ensembling method, which combines climate models within a Bayesian model averaging framework, to improve the predictive capability of model ensembles. Our proposed BNN approach calculates spatiotemporally varying model weights and biases by leveraging individual models' simulation skill, calibrates the ensemble prediction against observations by considering observation data uncertainty, and quantifies epistemic uncertainty when extrapolating to new conditions. More importantly, the BNN method provides interpretability about which climate model contributes more to the ensemble prediction at which locations and times. Thus, beyond its predictive capability, the method also brings insights and understanding of the models to guide further model and data development. In this study, we design experiments using an ensemble of CMIP6 climate model simulations to illustrate the BNN ensembling method's capability with respect to prediction accuracy, interpretability, and uncertainty quantification (UQ). We demonstrate that BNN can correctly assign larger weights to the regions and seasons where the individual model fits the observation better. Moreover, its offered interpretability is consistent with our understanding of localized climate model performance. Additionally, BNN shows an increasing uncertainty when the prediction is farther away from the period with constrained data, which appropriately reflects our trustworthiness of the models in the changing climate.
Reference39 articles.
1. Abramowitz, G. and Bishop, C., Climate Model Dependence and the Ensemble Dependence Transformation of CMIP Projections, J. Climate, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 2332-2348,2015. 2. Ahmed, K., Sachindra, D.A., Shahid, S., Iqbal, Z., Nawaz, N., and Khan, N., Multi-Model Ensemble Predictions of Precipitation and Temperature Using Machine Learning Algorithms, Atmos. Res., vol. 236, p. 104806,2020. 3. Alexander, K. and Easterbrook, S.M., The Software Architecture of Climate Models: A Graphical Comparison of CMIP5 and EMICAR5 Configurations, Geosci. Model Dev., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 1221-1232, 2015. 4. Amos, M., Young,P.J.,Hosking, J.S.,Lamarque, J.F., Abraham, N.L., Akiyoshi,H., Archibald, A.T.,Bekki, S., Deushi, M., and Jockel, P., Projecting Ozone Hole Recovery Using an Ensemble of Chemistry-Climate Models Weighted by Model Performance and Independence, Atmos. Chem. Phys, vol. 20, no. 16, pp. 9961-9977,2020. 5. Ashfaq, M., Rastogi, D., Abid, M.A., and Kao, S.C., Evaluation of CMIP6 GCMs over the CONUS for Downscaling Studies, J. Geophys. Res.: Atmospheres, vol. 127, p. e2022JD036659,2022.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|