Perception of ecosystem services provided by carp ponds in Pasłęk, Poland
-
Published:2023-05-13
Issue:1
Volume:84
Page:197-209
-
ISSN:2300-6420
-
Container-title:Economics and Environment
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:EiS
Author:
Turkowski KonradORCID, Dubrowski Michał
Abstract
An assessment of perceptions of fishpond ecosystem services was conducted in Pasłek, a town located in northeastern Poland. Ninety-four expert interviews were conducted with non-fishermen. The survey included a list of 28 possible ecosystem services provided by fishponds. Environmental benefits were considered the most important, followed by social and productive services. Respondents rated the ponds' function as a place for fish spawning and reproduction highest, followed by their role as fire reservoirs and as a place for recreation and leisure. A comparison with other surveys showed that perceptions of ecosystem services in local surveys could be influenced by a number of conditions, including, among others, the nature and location of fish ponds. The survey showed that people not involved in fisheries and fish farming are aware of the wide range of ecosystem services fishponds provide. This is a positive social recommendation for European fisheries policy, which aims to develop aquaculture without deteriorating the environment, creating a balanced relationship between producers and consumers of production and non-production aquaculture products.
Publisher
Fundacja Ekonomistow Srodowiska i Zasobow Naturalnych
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Economics and Econometrics,Ecology
Reference34 articles.
1. Adámek, Z., Linhart, O., Kratochvíl, M., Flajšhans, M., Randák, T., Policar, T., Masojídek, J., & Kozák, P. (2012). Aquaculture in the Czech Republic in 2012: Modern European prosperous sector based on the thousand-year history of pond culture. World Aquaculture, 43(2), 20. 2. Békefi, E., & Váradi, L. (2007). Multifunctional pond fish farms in Hungary. Aquaculture International, 15, 227-233. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10499-007-9090-5 3. Bunce, G.H., Ryszkowski, & Paoletti, L.M.G. (1993). Landscape ecology and agroecosystems. Boca Raton: Lewis Publishers. 4. Cižkova, H., Květ, J., Comín, A., Laiho, R., Pokorný, J., & Pithart, D. (2013). Actual state of European wetlands and their possible future in the context of global climate change. Aquatic Sciences, 75, 3-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-011-0233-4 5. Costanza, R., d’Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O’Neill, R. V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R. G., Sutton, P., & van del Bert, M. (1997). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387, 253-260. https://doi.org/10.1038/387253a0
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|