Comparison of the impact of R449-A and R290 on refrigerated display cabinets using life-cycle climate performance method

Abstract

Due to the high energy consumption of refrigerated display cabinets used in supermarkets, a life cycle cooling performance analysis to increase energy efficiency and reduce environmental impacts is the main subject of this study. It also emphasizes the need for cabinets that consume less energy and provide environmentally friendly working conditions. The Life Cycle Climate Performance (LCCP) of the two refrigerants R290 and R449-A was evaluated using measured data to compare the environmental impact of the refrigerants over the entire fluid and equipment life cycle, including energy consumption. Both vapor-compressed cooling cycles were thermodynamically modeled with the parameters taken from the experiments and the efficiency of system was calculated by using the EES software. The results show that the cabinet using R290 has lower compressor power utilization. The COP of the R290 system increased by 13% compared to the R449A system. The total daily energy consumption was also significantly lower for the R290 system. The energy efficiency index provides a standardized metric that can be used to compare the performance of different cooling systems. In this study, the energy efficiency index value was 17.3 points lower for the R290 system, indicating higher energy efficiency. The energy classes are “E” for the R449-A system and “C” for the R290 system, with the R290 system two classes higher in terms of energy class labeling. The EEI value of the system with R290 refrigerant has been reduced by 33% in comparison with the system with R449A refrigerant. The system using R290 refrigerant achieved a 33% reduction in energy consumption compared to the system using R449A refrigerant. The study also assessed the life cycle climate performance of the two systems. It was found that the R449-A system emits 19032.45 kg CO2e more over its lifetime compared to the R290 system. This was attributed to the relatively high global warming potential and energy consumption of R449-A refrigerant. However, when considering safety (flammability), it was concluded that R-449A has a lower environmental impact than R-290.