Preterm Neuroimaging and School-Age Cognitive Outcomes

Author:

Hintz Susan R.1,Vohr Betty R.2,Bann Carla M.3,Taylor H. Gerry4,Das Abhik5,Gustafson Kathryn E.6,Yolton Kimberly7,Watson Victoria E.2,Lowe Jean8,DeAnda Maria Elena1,Ball M. Bethany1,Finer Neil N.9,Van Meurs Krisa P.1,Shankaran Seetha10,Pappas Athina10,Barnes Patrick D.1,Bulas Dorothy11,Newman Jamie E.3,Wilson-Costello Deanne E.4,Heyne Roy J.12,Harmon Heidi M.13,Peralta-Carcelen Myriam14,Adams-Chapman Ira15,Duncan Andrea Freeman16,Fuller Janell8,Vaucher Yvonne E.9,Colaizy Tarah T.17,Winter Sarah18,McGowan Elisabeth C.219,Goldstein Ricki F.6,Higgins Rosemary D.20,

Affiliation:

1. Division of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Stanford University and Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital, Palo Alto, California;

2. Department of Pediatrics, Women and Infants Hospital and Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island;

3. Social, Statistical, and Environmental Sciences Unit, Research Triangle Institute International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina;

4. Department of Pediatrics, Rainbow Babies and Children’s Hospital and Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio;

5. Social, Statistical, and Environmental Sciences Unit, Research Triangle Institute International, Rockville, Maryland;

6. Department of Pediatrics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina;

7. Perinatal Institute, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio;

8. Department of Pediatrics, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico;

9. Department of Pediatrics, University of California at San Diego, San Diego, California;

10. Department of Pediatrics, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan;

11. Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Radiology, Children’s National Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia;

12. Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas;

13. Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana;

14. Division of Neonatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama;

15. Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Emory University and Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia;

16. Department of Pediatrics, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas at Houston, Houston, Texas;

17. Department of Pediatrics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa;

18. Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah;

19. Division of Newborn Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Tufts Medical Center, Floating Hospital for Children, Boston, Massachusetts; and

20. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Children born extremely preterm are at risk for cognitive difficulties and disability. The relative prognostic value of neonatal brain MRI and cranial ultrasound (CUS) for school-age outcomes remains unclear. Our objectives were to relate near-term conventional brain MRI and early and late CUS to cognitive impairment and disability at 6 to 7 years among children born extremely preterm and assess prognostic value. METHODS: A prospective study of adverse early and late CUS and near-term conventional MRI findings to predict outcomes at 6 to 7 years including a full-scale IQ (FSIQ) <70 and disability (FSIQ <70, moderate-to-severe cerebral palsy, or severe vision or hearing impairment) in a subgroup of Surfactant Positive Airway Pressure and Pulse Oximetry Randomized Trial enrollees. Stepwise logistic regression evaluated associations of neuroimaging with outcomes, adjusting for perinatal-neonatal factors. RESULTS: A total of 386 children had follow-up. In unadjusted analyses, severity of white matter abnormality and cerebellar lesions on MRI and adverse CUS findings were associated with outcomes. In full regression models, both adverse late CUS findings (odds ratio [OR] 27.9; 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.0–129) and significant cerebellar lesions on MRI (OR 2.71; 95% CI 1.1–6.7) remained associated with disability, but only adverse late CUS findings (OR 20.1; 95% CI 3.6–111) were associated with FSIQ <70. Predictive accuracy of stepwise models was not substantially improved with the addition of neuroimaging. CONCLUSIONS: Severe but rare adverse late CUS findings were most strongly associated with cognitive impairment and disability at school age, and significant cerebellar lesions on MRI were associated with disability. Near-term conventional MRI did not substantively enhance prediction of severe early school-age outcomes.

Publisher

American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3