Prospective Observational Study on High-Value Care Topics Discussed on Multidisciplinary Rounds

Author:

Beck Jimmy B.1,McDaniel Corrie E.1,Bradford Miranda C.2,Brock Doug3,Sy Carolyn D.4,Chen Tiffany4,Foti Jeffrey1,White Andrew A.45

Affiliation:

1. Departments of Pediatrics and

2. Seattle Children’s Research Institute, Seattle, Washington

3. Division of Family Medicine, and

4. Medicine, and

5. Center for Scholarship in Patient Care Quality and Safety, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; and

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Establishing a high-value care (HVC) culture within an institution requires a multidisciplinary commitment and participation. Bedside rounds provide an ideal environment for role modeling and learning behaviors that promote an HVC culture. However, little is understood regarding the types of HVC discussions that take place at the bedside and who participates in those discussions. METHODS: A prospective observational study at a tertiary-care, university-affiliated, free-standing children’s hospital. The prevalence of HVC discussions was captured by using the HVC Rounding Tool, a previously developed instrument with established validity evidence. For each observed HVC discussion, raters recorded who initiated the discussion and a description of the topic. RESULTS: Raters observed 660 patient encounters over 59 separate dates. Of all patient encounters, 29% (191 of 660; 95% confidence interval: 26%–33%) included at least 1 observed HVC discussion. The attending physician or fellow initiated 41% of all HVC discussions, followed by residents or medical students (31%), families (12%), and nurses (7%). CONCLUSIONS: Despite a recent focus on improving health care value and educating trainees in the practice of HVC, our study demonstrated that bedside discussions of HVC are occurring with a limited frequency at our institution and that attending physicians initiate the majority of discussions. The capacity of the nonphysician team members to contribute to establishing and sustaining an HVC culture may be underused. Multi-institutional studies are necessary to determine if this is a national trend and whether discussions have an impact on patient outcomes and hospital costs.

Publisher

American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)

Subject

Pediatrics,General Medicine,Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Reference45 articles.

1. The causal effect of health insurance on utilization and outcomes in adults: a systematic review of US studies;Freeman;Med Care,2008

2. Roundtable on Evidence-Based Medicine;Yong,2010

3. Davis K, Stremikis K, Squires D, Schoen C; The Commonwealth Fund. Mirror, mirror on the wall, 2014 update: how the U.S. health care system compares internationally. 2014. Available at: www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/fund-reports/2014/jun/mirror-mirror. Accessed February 1, 2016

4. Providing high-value, cost-conscious care: a critical seventh general competency for physicians;Weinberger;Ann Intern Med,2011

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3