You Don’t Know What You Don’t Know: Using Nominal Group Technique to Identify and Prioritize Education Topics for Regional Hospitals

Author:

Sauers-Ford Hadley S.1,Hamline Michelle Y.1,Tzimenatos Leah2,McKnight Heather1,Hamilton Charlaine M.3,McKennan Maureen G.3,Rosenthal Jennifer L.1

Affiliation:

1. Departments of Pediatrics and

2. Emergency Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California; and

3. Regional Affiliations and Outreach,University of California, Davis Health, Sacramento, California

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Our 121-bed children’s hospital is a quaternary care referral center for a 33-county region. Referring hospitals asked for Pediatric Acute Care Education Sessions (PACES). To determine which topics to prioritize for these sessions, nominal group technique (NGT) methods were used to obtain stakeholder-prioritized consensus on education topics. METHODS: Five NGT sessions were conducted over 6 weeks at referring hospitals throughout central and northern California. Each session lasted ∼90 minutes and engaged a diverse multidisciplinary group of stakeholders. At these sessions, stakeholders answered the question “What are your top 5 clinical topics that should be prioritized by PACES?” NGT numeric ranking methods were used to determine prioritized topics. A thematic analysis was performed on the session transcripts. RESULTS: The 5 sessions had 43 total participants, including nurses, respiratory therapists, physicians, and administrators. The top 4 prioritized topics were sepsis, diabetic ketoacidosis, respiratory failure or support, and bronchiolitis and/or respiratory syncytial virus. Unique education needs for each hospital were also uncovered in the NGT discussion. Three qualitative themes emerged from the discussion: diverse educational needs, the need for guidelines on telemedicine and transfer, and relationship building. CONCLUSIONS: The use of NGT to engage multisite, multidisciplinary stakeholders helped to inform an education program. The use of NGT methods provided rich information that would not have been obtained through surveys alone and helped facilitate relationship building. The PACES group was able to identify and prioritize education topics of interest to referring community hospitals.

Publisher

American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)

Subject

Pediatrics,General Medicine,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Reference30 articles.

1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US). Overview of pediatric emergency department visits. Statistical brief #242. 2018. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK526418/. Accessed October 3, 2018

2. Joint policy statement–guidelines for care of children in the emergency department;American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Pediatric Emergency Medicine; American College of Emergency Physicians, Pediatric Committee; Emergency Nurses Association, Pediatric Committee;J Emerg Nurs,2013

3. Availability of pediatric services and equipment in emergency departments: United States, 2002-03;Middleton;Adv Data,2006

4. Academic-community partnerships improve outcomes in pediatric trauma care;Kelley-Quon;J Pediatr Surg,2015

5. Enhancing pediatric asthma care and nursing education through an academic practice partnership;McClure;J Pediatr Nurs,2017

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3