Pediatric Shared Decision-Making for Simple and Complex Decisions: Findings From a Delphi Panel

Author:

Eaton Sarah M.12,Clark Jonna D.3,Cummings Christy L.4,Kon Alexander A.56,Morrison Wynne7,Feudtner Chris89,Streuli Jürg C.1109

Affiliation:

1. aInstitute of Biomedical Ethics

2. bMiller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida

3. cDivision of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

4. dDivision of Newborn Medicine, Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

5. eCommunity Children’s, Missoula, Montana

6. fUniversity of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington

7. gDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

8. hDivision of General Pediatrics, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

9. *Contributed equally as co-senior authors

10. iUniversity Children’s Hospital and the Children’s Research Center, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To develop recommendations for pediatric shared decision-making (SDM). METHODS We conducted a Delphi method study from 2020 to 2021 with an international panel (n = 21) of clinicians, researchers, and parents with expertise in pediatric SDM. We conducted semistructured interviews to identify the key processes of pediatric SDM. We coded the interviews using content analysis and developed a questionnaire on the potential processes of pediatric SDM. Using a Likert scale, panelists evaluated each process twice, once for simple decisions and once for complex decisions. Panelists were provided with a summary of the results and evaluated each process again. The processes that were agreed on for simple and complex decisions were reported as “fundamental processes.” The processes that were agreed on for complex decisions were reported as “additional processes.” RESULTS A total of 79 recommendations were developed, including 29 fundamental processes and 14 additional processes for complex decisions. A recurring theme was the importance of personalizing the decision-making process. For example, the panel recommended that physicians should assess the family and child’s desired roles in the decision-making process, assess their desired level of directiveness, and elicit and clarify their values, preferences, and goals. The panel also disagreed on several subprocesses, such as how to determine the child’s role and the appropriate level of directiveness. CONCLUSIONS An international expert panel developed recommendations for pediatric SDM for both simple and complex decisions. The recommendations highlight the importance of personalizing the decision-making process.

Publisher

American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3